Why the BJP struggles in Tamil Nadu

3 months ago 1
ARTICLE AD BOX
M.G. Ramachandran and Jayalalithaa neutralised the BJP’s entreaty  by occupying the abstraction  of “soft Hindutva” wrong   a Dravidian governmental  framework. File

M.G. Ramachandran and Jayalalithaa neutralised the BJP’s entreaty by occupying the abstraction of “soft Hindutva” wrong a Dravidian governmental framework. File | Photo Credit: The Hindu

In theory, Tamil Nadu should person been fertile crushed for the BJP and the Sangh Parivar to instrumentality root. The State’s taste scenery includes the Bhakti movement, temples, a immense assemblage of devotional literature, and Sangam poesy that praises respective deities. Despite the rationalist movement, a bulk of the radical are believers. Even respective politicians who benefited from ‘Periyar’ E.V. Ramasamy’s Dravidian question proceed to practise religion successful their idiosyncratic lives. In fact, the fewer leaders who stay committed to Periyar’s hard-core ideology person been incapable to transportation their ain families to travel it fully.

Yet, the BJP has failed to person spiritual Hindus into governmental Hindus successful Tamil Nadu. This is due to the fact that the socio-religious contented of the portion — from the Bhakti question to the Self-Respect Movement — has been profoundly anti-Brahmin and hostile to Brahminical rituals and Sanskritic modes of worship.

There has besides agelong been absorption among Tamils to viewing themselves chiefly done the homogenising class of ‘Hindu’. Internal sectarian identities person often been stronger than immoderate pan-Hindu consciousness. The Supreme Court’s determination to name a retired justice to mediate the Vadakalai-Tenkalai quality among Vaishnavites astatine the Varadaraja Perumal Temple successful Kanchipuram underlines this fragmentation. The antagonism betwixt Shaivites and Vaishnavites has been nary little intense.

The Dravidian question itself has its roots successful the humanities struggle betwixt Brahmins and Vellalas. The Vellalas, a land-holding assemblage with expertise successful agriculture, were predominantly Shaivites. The intelligence instauration of the Dravidian question was laid mostly by educated Vellalas who were anti-Brahmin.

The historian, A. R. Venkatachalapathy, successful Dravida Iyakkamum Vellalarum, notes that portion respective Vellala scholars supported the Self-Respect Movement, they were furious erstwhile the mag Kudi Arasu, tally by Periyar, published a bid of articles ridiculing the Periyapuranam, the poetic hagiography of the 63 Shaivite saints. This occurrence reveals the limits of Vellala enactment for extremist rationalism erstwhile it encroached upon Shaivite devotional tradition. In its aboriginal years, the DMK itself was derisively referred to arsenic the Dravida Mudaliar Kazhagam — a disapproval of the beardown beingness of Mudaliars, a assemblage ranked conscionable beneath Brahmins successful the accepted societal hierarchy, successful the party.

Alongside these developments, a chiseled intelligence contented emerged among the Scheduled Castes (SCs) successful Tamil Nadu. Pandit Iyothee Thass was a formidable student who articulated a extremist critique of caste and religion. Another salient SC leader, Swami Sahajananda, portion alert that the halfway operation of Hinduism rested connected the varna system, nevertheless remained a practising Hindu and adjacent spoke against the depletion of beef. These examples complicate immoderate simplistic communicative that equates anti-caste authorities with a rejection of spiritual belief.

What past worked against the BJP — and continues to support it astatine a region successful Tamil Nadu — was the emergence of the AIADMK arsenic a large governmental force. M.G. Ramachandran (MGR), the laminitis of the AIADMK, was a devoted follower of the goddess, Mookambika, and popularised the deity crossed Tamil Nadu. Jayalalithaa adjacent sent bricks to Ayodhya for the operation of the Ram temple. In effect, they neutralised the BJP’s entreaty by occupying the abstraction of “soft Hindutva” wrong a Dravidian governmental framework.

Had MGR remained wrong the DMK, the lack of the AIADMK from the governmental scenery mightiness person enabled the Congress to relation arsenic a viable absorption and adjacent seizure power. In specified a scenario, the BJP could person much easy displaced the Congress and occupied that space. Instead, the AIADMK foreclosed this possibility, leaving the BJP without a wide ideological oregon electoral opening.

By preferring a presumption quo attack to the caste system, the BJP has failed to bespeak the ethos of Tamil Nadu. When determination were demands for performing pujas successful Tamil and for the assignment of non-Brahmins arsenic priests, BJP leaders opposed them.

The BJP-led Central authorities has besides failed to proactively instrumentality large improvement schemes successful the State. It has been incapable to crook the tables connected the Dravidian parties, which person a beardown organisational basal and heavy taste legitimacy.

Published - February 04, 2026 12:45 americium IST

Read Entire Article