Act against officers responsible for fabricating evidence: court to Delhi Police chief

4 months ago 4
ARTICLE AD BOX
The communal unit   that unfolded successful  north-east Delhi successful  February 2020 near  implicit    50 dormant   and respective  injured.

The communal unit that unfolded successful north-east Delhi successful February 2020 near implicit 50 dormant and respective injured. | Photo Credit: record photo

A metropolis tribunal has directed Delhi Police Commissioner Satish Golchha to initiate enactment against officers liable for “serious lapses”, including grounds tampering, successful the probe into a 2020 riots case.

In its January 31 order, Additional Sessions Judge Parveen Singh of the Karkardooma Courts acquitted six persons — Prem Prakash, Ishu Gupta, Rajkumar, Amit, Rahul and Surendra Singh — booked for transgression conspiracy, rioting, demolition of spot with explosives, among different charges, observing that the rights of the accused would not person been “bulldozed and pulverized” had the constabulary conducted a just probe.

In their chargesheet, the constabulary had accused the six of being portion of a mob that acceptable occurrence to respective shops and houses adjacent Aziziya mosque successful New Usmanpur successful north-east Delhi connected February 25, 2020.

The communal unit that unfolded successful February 2020 near implicit 50 dormant and respective injured.

‘Tampering with impunity’

“I indispensable observe that the audacity and impunity with which the grounds was tampered with reflects a implicit breakdown of the supervisory mechanics due to the fact that the fabricated chargesheet was forwarded by the supervisory officers, i.e. the past SHO and the ACP,” said the court. It directed the constabulary main to instrumentality enactment to “prevent the recurrence of specified ignominy”.

The tribunal called the prosecution’s lawsuit “built up” and said the eyewitness statements were “manipulated and fabricated” and tampered with.

Regarding a CCTV footage submitted by the prosecution arsenic grounds against Mr. Prakash, the further sessions justice stated, “When the video files successful the pen thrust were played, determination was lone a achromatic screen… the files were blank. I neglect to recognize by what divine involution the IO [Investigating Officer] of the lawsuit came to cognize that Prem Prakash was progressive successful this riot.”

“Therefore, I find that the prosecution has miserably failed to beryllium its lawsuit against the accused, and each the accused are acquitted of each the charges framed against them,” helium added.

Published - February 04, 2026 04:50 americium IST

Read Entire Article