4 months ago
2
For Europe, it was archetypal a astonishment and past a shock. During his archetypal term, Donald Trump had shown involvement successful buying Greenland, an autonomous Arctic land that’s portion of Denmark. When Mr. Trump, aft returning to the White House past year, said “we are going to person Greenland 1 mode oregon the other”, galore thought helium was not serious.
Trump Greenland LIVE connected January 20, 2026
But aft the January 3 U.S. onslaught connected Venezuela and the seizure of President Nicolas Maduro, Mr. Trump escalated his claims implicit Greenland. If the U.S. doesn’t instrumentality power of the island, Russia oregon China will, helium said. Mr. Trump’s repeated statements person thrown transatlantic practice into disarray. Tensions reached a caller highest connected January 17, erstwhile Mr. Trump imposed a 10% tariff connected 8 European countries, including Denmark, Germany, France and the U.K. He said the tariffs would beryllium raised to 25% connected June 1 and would stay successful spot until the U.S.’ “complete and full acquisition of Greenland”.
While determination were tensions successful transatlantic relations successful the past — notably during the Suez situation of 1956 oregon the American penetration of Iraq successful 2003 — this is the archetypal clip tensions person reached the level of unfastened hostility. Here what makes the existent situation much terrible is that it was triggered by a propulsion from the U.S., a state that has been Europe’s superior information guarantor since the extremity of the Second World War, to instrumentality power of a European territory.
Threat from within
To spot the situation successful context: Greenland is an autonomous territory of Denmark, which is 1 of the founding members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). NATO, arguably the world’s astir almighty subject alliance, is built connected the rule of corporate defence — that an onslaught against 1 subordinate would beryllium considered an onslaught against all. This model functioned efficaciously during the Cold War arsenic a deterrent against the Soviet Union. European countries person besides presented NATO arsenic a bulwark against Vladimir Putin’s Russia. But here, the menace to Denmark’s sovereignty doesn’t travel from extracurricular the alliance, but from wrong it — from NATO’s astir almighty member, the U.S.
On Tuesday (January 20, 2026), Mr. Trump fired disconnected a bid of societal media posts, up of a gathering with European leaders successful Davos connected the sidelines of the World Economic Forum, saying determination is nary going backmost connected Greenland, which helium said is “imperative for nationalist and satellite security”. Greenland’s determination betwixt North America and the Arctic makes it strategically placed for aboriginal informing systems successful the lawsuit of rocket attacks, and for monitoring vessels successful the region. The land besides has immense untapped resources. Greenland is estimated to person 36 cardinal tonnes of uncommon earths—an country which is presently dominated by China.
The U.S. has a subject basal connected the island, called Pituffik, wherever much than 100 unit are permanently stationed. Under existing agreements with Denmark, the U.S. tin nonstop arsenic galore troops arsenic it wants to Greenland. But Mr. Trump doesn’t look to beryllium blessed with the existing agreement. He wants to marque the land an American territory. On Tuesday (January 20, 2026), helium shared a generated image of himself placing an American emblem successful Greenland beside a committee that reads, “Greenland: US territory; Est. 2026”.
Between Russia and America
European leaders person protested Mr. Trump’s determination to enforce tariffs implicit Greenland. But it is not wide whether they would retaliate successful kind. Europe appears to beryllium successful a strategically weakened position, caught betwixt Russia’s penetration of Ukraine and America’s propulsion to instrumentality implicit Greenland.
For decades, Europe has been heavy babelike connected the U.S. for security. The U.S. accounts for astir two-thirds of NATO’s subject spending, and provides astir of the alliance’s rocket defence, atomic umbrella (along with Britain and France) and long-range precision capabilities. The Supreme Allied Commander Europe, the highest subject commandant successful NATO, is ever an American General, and galore European militaries are interoperable with U.S. systems by design. The U.S. operates astatine slightest 37 subject bases successful Europe, hosting astir 80,000 soldiers.
Most European countries person pledged to summation defence spending, but it volition instrumentality years earlier they physique the capableness to basal connected their own. In the meantime, they request the U.S. and NATO for security. That dependency has lone deepened since Russia’s penetration of Ukraine. Europe has adopted a beardown motivation and strategical presumption against Russia, and has, until now, opposed large Ukrainian concessions to Moscow for peace. But if Europe wants Ukraine to proceed to combat the invasion, it besides needs sustained America’s support—what Keir Starmer, the British Prime Minister, described arsenic the “backstop”. Mr. Trump, who has ever been sceptical of NATO, understands this leverage.
Few bully options
Mr. Trump is not funny successful a prolonged confrontation with Russia. His contiguous strategical focus, per his National Security Strategy, is connected the Western Hemisphere and semipermanent absorption is connected China. Europe, successful his worldview, is steadily losing its strategical relevance.
Mr. Trump says helium is committed to NATO. But helium wants NATO to assistance him instrumentality implicit Greenland, violating the sovereignty of a European NATO member. In effect, helium is turning NATO against NATO, seeking to extract a large territorial concession from Europe. Unable to unafraid bid with Russia and progressively babelike connected NATO (U.S.) astatine a clip of warfare successful eastbound Europe, European leaders are near with fewer bully options erstwhile it comes to dealing with Mr. Trump’s threats.
