West Bengal Government questions maintainability of ED plea in Supreme Court on I-PAC case

3 months ago 1
ARTICLE AD BOX
The Directorate of Enforcement conducted searches connected  the premises of governmental  consultancy steadfast  I-PAC and its director, Pratik Jain, successful  Kolkata arsenic  portion  of a wealth  laundering investigation, authoritative  sources said. File

The Directorate of Enforcement conducted searches connected the premises of governmental consultancy steadfast I-PAC and its director, Pratik Jain, successful Kolkata arsenic portion of a wealth laundering investigation, authoritative sources said. File | Photo Credit: PTI

The West Bengal Government has questioned the Directorate of Enforcement (ED )’s determination to attack the Supreme Court seeking a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the alleged obstruction of its raids astatine the offices of governmental consultancy steadfast I-PAC by West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and State officials.

The State asked whether the petition was maintainable erstwhile a akin lawsuit was pending earlier the Calcutta High Court urging identical grounds of challenge.

A Bench headed by Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra had, connected January 15, stayed the Kolkata Police probe against ED officials who conducted searches astatine I-PAC bureau and the residence of its co-founder Pratik Jain connected January 8.

The State constabulary probe had been based connected allegations that delicate predetermination records of the State’s ruling Trinamool Congress, which consults I-PAC connected electoral and governmental strategy, were “stolen” by the Central bureau officials during the raids. The complaints were lodged against the ED astatine Shakespeare Sarani Police Station and Bidhannagar Electronic Complex Police Station.

Filing its effect to the ED petition, the State Government said determination cannot beryllium “parallel proceedings” earlier the High Court and the Supreme Court. It said the Central bureau did not person the cardinal close to record a writ petition earlier the apical court. The State argued that the ED did not person the powerfulness to behaviour “omnibus hunt and seizure” and that the bureau had violated privileged communications.

The ED has sought a CBI probe against State and constabulary unit for obstructing raids, which were portion of an probe into a ₹2,742-crore ember smuggling case. The Bench, successful its order, said the lawsuit raises “serious” issues relating to the scope of the investigations carried retired by Central agencies similar the ED and interference by State agencies.

“According to us, for the adherence to the regularisation of instrumentality successful the state and to guarantee that each organ functions independently, it is indispensable to analyse this contented truthful that offenders are not allowed to beryllium protected nether the shield of instrumentality enforcement agencies of a peculiar State. There are larger questions progressive here. If they are near undecided, the concern whitethorn go worse and a concern of lawlessness whitethorn prevail successful 1 oregon the different State, considering that antithetic outfits are governing antithetic States,” the Bench had recorded successful the January 15 order.

Published - February 02, 2026 11:02 p.m. IST

Read Entire Article