5 months ago
1
The unfortunate of the 2017 Unnao rape case, successful which ex-BJP MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar was convicted, has approached the CBI seeking the registration of an FIR against the then-investigating serviceman for being “hand successful glove” with the erstwhile legislator.
The pistillate besides claimed that she and her household were facing threats from assorted quarters.
The improvement comes amid increasing disappointment successful respective quarters aft the Delhi High Court precocious granted conditional bail to Sengar and suspended his beingness condemnation successful the case.
Sengar, however, volition stay successful jailhouse arsenic helium is besides serving a 10-year word for the custodial decease of the rape survivor's father.
In her complaint, the unfortunate alleged that the investigating serviceman conducted the probe dishonestly, with mala fides, and successful specified a mode that Senger and the different accused whitethorn get the benefits of “deliberate lapses and manipulation of facts introduced, and unafraid a favourable outcome”.
She alleged that the serviceman utilized forged schoolhouse documents successful the chargesheet, wherein she was shown arsenic a pupil of a authorities schoolhouse and her day of commencement was besides shown differently, whereas, successful reality, she ne'er took admittance successful that school.
The unfortunate besides claimed that the serviceman mentioned successful the chargesheet that she was utilizing the mobile telephone of a pistillate named Heera Singh, adjacent though she ne'er utilized that phone.
Also, respective statements were falsely attributed to her successful the chargesheet, she claimed.
In the six-page complaint, the victim, who was a insignificant astatine the clip of her rape successful 2017, claimed she filed a ailment earlier arsenic well, but nary enactment was taken against the officer.
Citing the proceedings tribunal bid convicting Sengar, wherever the tribunal questioned the signaling of her connection by the probe officer, she accused the serviceman of being “hand successful glove” with the accused to prevention them (Sengar and others) from prosecution.
The CBI had challenged the observations of the proceedings tribunal successful the Delhi High Court.
During the trial, the CBI had said that the investigating officer’s claims connected the mobile telephone utilized by the unfortunate were “mere opinion” and not a "conclusive proof”, and simply connected that basis, “no presumption tin beryllium raised that the serviceman was siding with the accused party”.
"There is much to the communicative than what meets the eye, arsenic it appears that the probe was not conducted fairly, and the attack of the IO/CBI leaves an content that signaling of the girl’s connection was with a presumption to discredit the mentation of the victim/survivor and her household members successful the contiguous case,” the tribunal had said.
