UGC brings out new rules against caste discrimination

4 months ago 1
ARTICLE AD BOX

The University Grants Commission (UGC) has notified caller regulations to code caste-based favoritism successful higher acquisition institutions crossed the country. The caller rules mandate the mounting up of equity committees connected campuses and specify punishments, which tin scope from being debarred from offering degrees oregon programmes, for non-compliance.

The University Grants Commission (Promotion of Equity successful Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2026, notified connected Tuesday (January 14, 2025), are an update connected the anti-discrimination regulations successful spot since 2012. A draught mentation of the updated rules was enactment retired by the UGC for nationalist suggestions successful February past year, inviting wide disapproval for the mode it kept the Other Backward Classes (OBCs) extracurricular the ambit of caste-based favoritism and the deficiency of specificity successful the mode it defined discrimination.

Further, the draught mentation of the regulations projected a proviso to “discourage” mendacious complaints of discrimination, suggesting fines for specified complaints.

In the last notified mentation of the rules, the UGC has included OBCs nether the ambit of “caste-based discrimination” and dropped the proviso connected mendacious complaints. Further, its explanation of “discrimination” has been expanded somewhat to see immoderate of the connection contained successful the 2012 regulations.

Religion, different grounds

In the caller regulations, the UGC has said that “caste-based discrimination” would mean “discrimination lone connected the ground of caste oregon people against the members of the Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and Other Backward Classes”. Further, it defines “discrimination” arsenic “any unfair, differential, oregon biased attraction oregon immoderate specified enactment against immoderate stakeholder, whether explicit oregon implicit, connected the grounds lone of religion, race, caste, gender, spot of birth, disability, oregon immoderate of them”.

In borrowing from the explanation successful the 2012 regulations, the UGC added that “discrimination” would see “any distinction, exclusion, limitation, oregon preference, which has the intent oregon effect of nullifying oregon impairing equality of attraction successful acquisition and, successful particular, of imposing conditions connected immoderate stakeholder oregon radical of stakeholders that are incompatible with quality dignity”.

This explanation does distant with the circumstantial proviso of the 2012 regulations that prevented institutions from establishing oregon maintaining “separate acquisition systems oregon institutions for students oregon groups of students based connected caste, creed, religion, language, ethnicity, gender, and disabilities”. Further, circumstantial provisions of the 2012 regulations that outline 8 antithetic manifestations of favoritism against the SCs and the STs successful the process of admittance and acceptance into institutes, besides bash not find notation successful the caller regulations.

Equity committees

In the caller regulations, the UGC mandates the mounting up of adjacent accidental centres (EOC) successful each institution, to beforehand “equity and adjacent accidental to the assemblage astatine ample successful the higher acquisition institutions (HEIs) and to bring astir societal inclusion”. Under these, an equity committee is to beryllium formed. These equity committees, chaired by the caput of the instauration indispensable person the practice of OBCs, persons with disabilities, SCs, STs, and women, the regulations said.

While the EOC volition beryllium expected to taxable a bi-annual study of its functioning, the equity committees person been mandated to conscionable astatine slightest doubly a year. In addition, the regulations necessitate each institute to taxable an yearly study connected the functioning of the EOCs to the UGC for yearly review.

Monitoring panel

The UGC volition enactment successful spot a monitoring mechanics to reappraisal the advancement of the implementation of these regulations. It volition acceptable up a national-level monitoring committee with representatives of statutory nonrecreational councils and commissions, and from civilian society, the regulations said, adding that this panel, which volition beryllium expected to conscionable astatine slightest doubly a year, volition oversee their implementation. It volition besides look into issues of discrimination, and suggest ways to forestall it.

The regulations specify that each institute volition person a work to “eradicate discrimination”, “promote equity”, and instrumentality measures due for this. The caput of the instauration volition beryllium vested with the powers and work to spot that the regulations are followed.

In the lawsuit of non-compliance, higher acquisition institutes whitethorn beryllium debarred from participating successful UGC schemes, debarred from offering grade programmes, region learning programmes, and online mode programmes, and whitethorn besides beryllium removed from the UGC’s database of higher acquisition institutions.

Read Entire Article