TP cover: necessary, but isn’t enough

6 months ago 2
ARTICLE AD BOX
Representative image.

Representative image. | Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

Last Monday, we looked astatine the quality broadside of Motor Third-party (TP) Liability insurance. This compulsory screen is meant to support bid of caput — and finances — by shielding you from the ineligible load of compensating those who endure losses successful an mishap involving your vehicle.

But to get from the aged saying, a TP argumentation is ‘necessary, but not sufficient.’ It is indispensable for each conveyance owner. Yet, the fig of vehicles really insured is acold excessively tiny for the screen to relation arsenic a meaningful societal information nett for mishap victims and their families.

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court asked the security regulator — the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) — to mull ways to amended centrifugal security coverage, particularly for TP cover, a statutory request nether the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Poor coverage

The Court is besides expected to look astatine enforcement strategies and argumentation reforms, fixed the troubling information that a bulk of vehicles connected Indian roads are uninsured for TP liability. Estimates suggest by precocious 2023, astir fractional of each vehicles — astir 18 crore — had nary progressive TP cover. Another survey puts the uninsured stock astatine 57%.

This is not a caller failure. Non-compliance has been recognised for decades, examined successful committee reports, highlighted successful the media and dissected successful sentiment columns — including this one. Numerous solutions person been proposed, and immoderate adjacent tried, yet the occupation persists.

Ideas person ranged from adding a tiny cess connected substance to money TP payouts, to collecting a beingness TP premium alongside beingness roadworthy tax. Long-term 10-year policies were introduced, but uptake remained low, partially due to the fact that these policies were often not accepted by postulation police. In 2018, the Supreme Court mandated multi-year security astatine the clip of registration — 5 years for two-wheelers and 3 years for backstage cars. This nudged up the fig of insured vehicles for a while. But galore owners simply fto the argumentation lapse aft the archetypal artifact of coverage.

Stark situation

Today, the concern remains stark: if you bash not renew your TP cover, you hazard personally bearing the outgo of third-party spot damage, wounded oregon death. Compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) routinely runs into lakhs and crores.

Even diligent policyholders are indirectly affected. Every year, IRDAI reviews TP premiums. If full TP claims transcend the collected premium, rates are revised upward. And who bears this burden? Those of america who renew our policies connected time! In effect, the compliant extremity up subsidising the non-compliant — hardly a reward for doing the close thing.

All the much crushed to nudge that neighbour, person oregon comparative who ignores TP renewal.

Remind them that neglecting a mandatory argumentation doesn’t conscionable endanger others — it besides costs the remainder of us.

(The writer is simply a concern writer specialising successful security & firm history)

Published - November 24, 2025 06:45 americium IST

Read Entire Article