Discrepancies person been recovered successful the affidavits filed by Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) president C. Joseph Vijay successful his nominations for the Tiruchi East and Perambur Assembly constituencies with respect to idiosyncratic details, transgression disclosures, and plus declarations.
In the idiosyncratic details section, Mr. Vijay has declared his property arsenic 52 successful the Perambur affidavit, whereas it is stated arsenic 51 successful the Tiruchi East affidavit.
While the fig of lawsuit registered against him is stated arsenic “nil” successful the Perambur affidavit, the Tiruchi East 1 mentions 2 cases. Of these, 1 was registered aft helium filed the information successful Perambur. It was registered for an alleged usurpation of predetermination norms during Mr. Vijay’s run successful Chennai. The complaint, filed by the Kolathur Assembly constituency SST Team in-charge, stated that connected March 30, Mr. Vijay and astir 5,000 radical conducted run activities causing inconvenience to the public. The lawsuit has been booked nether Sections 126(2), 189(2), and 223 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), on with Sections 3(a) and 35 of the Tamil Nadu City Police Act.
The 2nd case, however, was registered for an earlier usurpation successful Madurai territory nether Sections 189(2), 296(b), and 115(2) of the BNS. According to the complaint, during a TVK league connected August 21, 2025, erstwhile Mr. Vijay was walking connected a ramp, the complainant climbed onto the stage. It is alleged that astir 10 bouncers pushed him, utilized abusive language, and caused thorax and interior injuries. In the affidavit, Mr. Vijay has stated that helium had not received immoderate summons oregon anterior intimation from the constabulary regarding this lawsuit and had travel to cognize of it lone recently, pursuing which it has been disclosed.
Differences are besides evident successful the movable assets section. Under investments successful companies, communal funds, securities, debentures, shares, and related instruments, the worth of shares held successful Jaya Nagar Property Pvt. Ltd. is declared arsenic ₹19,69,000 successful the Perambur affidavit, whereas it is ₹19,03,000 successful the Tiruchi East affidavit. Further, the Tiruchi East affidavit includes details of movable assets of his woman Sangeetha, lad J. Jason Sanjay, and girl J. Divya Shasha, whose names are not mentioned successful the Perambur affidavit.
For Sangeetha, some affidavits state 2 kg of silver; however, its worth is shown arsenic ₹25,000 successful the Perambur affidavit and ₹4,75,000 successful the Tiruchi East affidavit. The quantity and worth of golden (3,132 grams valued astatine ₹4,07,16,000) and diamonds (134.91 carats valued astatine ₹1,00,00,000) stay the aforesaid successful some affidavits.
In the Tiruchi East affidavit, the full worth of movable assets is calculated arsenic ₹96,866 for J. Jason Sanjay and ₹3,19,914 for J. Divya Shasha. These totals are not calculated oregon disclosed successful the Perambur affidavit. In the immovable assets section, the estimated marketplace worth of Mr. Vijay’s properties is declared arsenic ₹115,13,63,000 successful the Perambur affidavit, whereas it is ₹220,15,62,010 successful the Tiruchi East affidavit.
Under the conception seeking details of assets and liabilities (including assets held abroad), the Tiruchi East affidavit includes the movable plus values of his children — ₹96,866 for Jason Sanjay and ₹3,19,914 for Divya Shasha — whereas nary specified entries are made successful the Perambur affidavit.
Further discrepancies are noted successful the declaration of immovable assets of his wife. The Tiruchi East affidavit lists the estimated marketplace worth arsenic ₹2,50,00,000, portion the Perambur affidavit declares it arsenic ₹25,00,000. Party office-bearers indicated different acceptable of nominations could beryllium filed successful Perambur connected behalf of Mr. Vijay rectifying these discrepancies.

2 months ago
2






