Supreme Court upholds bail for man booked under UAPA

1 week ago 1
ARTICLE AD BOX
 Shanker Chakravarty

New Delhi : A presumption of the Supreme Court of India, successful New Delhi connected Tuesday. Photo: Shanker Chakravarty

The Supreme Court has upheld the bail granted by the Kerala High Court to a antheral booked nether the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) successful transportation with a brutal onslaught connected a assemblage prof who included, successful his Malayalam exam paper, a question considered objectionable by definite sections of a peculiar faith.

The assailants, allegedly members of the Popular Front of India (PFI), ambushed Professor T.J. Joseph, restrained him and chopped his close thenar disconnected successful 2010.

Confirming the High Court’s determination to assistance bail, the Supreme Court said the accused, K.A. Najeeb, had languished successful jailhouse arsenic an undertrial for much than 5 years. The prosecution, done the National Investigation Agency (NIA), has 276 much witnesses to examine. 

Delayed trial

A three-judge Bench led by Justice N.V. Ramana, successful a judgment pronounced connected February 1, observed that “no 1 tin warrant gross hold successful disposal of cases” which compel undertrials to stay incarcerated.

Booking a idiosyncratic with stringent charges should beryllium matched by speedy justice. Delay successful proceedings and compelling a idiosyncratic to languish successful jailhouse during a prolonged proceedings violates the close to beingness and dignity nether Article 21, the judgement said.

Justice Surya Kant, who authored the judgment, agreed with the High Court’s accent that proceedings nether the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 should beryllium expeditious.

Long witnesses list

The High Court had held that “the undertrial could not beryllium kept successful custody for excessively agelong erstwhile the proceedings was not apt to commence successful the adjacent future”. It would origin superior prejudice and suffering to him. 

“Not lone has the responsive been successful jailhouse for much than 5 years, but determination are 276 witnesses near to beryllium examined. Charges person been framed lone connected November 27, 2020. Still further, 2 opportunities were fixed to the NIA, who has shown nary inclination to surface its endless database of witnesses,” the Supreme Court reasoned.

The tribunal besides recovered that 13 different co-accused, who were convicted, were sentenced to not much than 8 years’ rigorous imprisonment. “It tin truthful beryllium legitimately expected that if recovered guilty, the responsive [Najeeb] excessively would person a condemnation wrong the aforesaid ballpark. Given that two-thirds of specified incarceration is complete, it appears that the responsive has already paid heavy for his acts of fleeing from justice,” Justice Kant noted.

Najeeb had absconded aft the incidental and was arrested lone successful 2015. His proceedings was separated from that of his co-accused.

The apex court, however, directed that the bail would beryllium cancelled if Najeeb violated immoderate of his bail conditions. 

Published - February 02, 2021 10:54 p.m. IST

Read Entire Article