Supreme Court underscores Tamil Nadu’s due representation on UPSC committee set to recommend regular police chief

3 months ago 2
ARTICLE AD BOX

The Supreme Court has fixed  Tamil Nadu support   to nominate an serviceman  higher successful  fertile  and presumption    than the DGP, similar  the Additional Chief Secretary, arsenic  a substitute to articulation  the Chief Secretary connected  the UPSC empanelment committee.

The Supreme Court has fixed Tamil Nadu support to nominate an serviceman higher successful fertile and presumption than the DGP, similar the Additional Chief Secretary, arsenic a substitute to articulation the Chief Secretary connected the UPSC empanelment committee. | Photo Credit: FILE PHOTO

The Supreme Court connected Thursday underscored that Tamil Nadu indispensable person afloat and owed practice connected the empanelment committee of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) acceptable to urge a regular constabulary main for the State.

The bid by a Bench, headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, ensured that States’ practice is not undercut successful the enactment of their constabulary chiefs tasked with protecting instrumentality and order. The committee comprises the UPSC Chairperson oregon his nominee, the Union Home Secretary oregon his nominee, the Chief Secretary of the State concerned, the incumbent DGP, and an serviceman nominated by the Ministry of Home Affairs. 

In Tamil Nadu’s case, the past regular DGP, Shankar Jiwal, had retired connected August 31 past year. The State had appointed G. Venkataraman as the DGP in-charge. However, Mr.  Venkataraman is besides 1 of the candidates successful the moving for the post. Tamil Nadu had written to the UPSC to let the Additional Chief Secretary to travel successful spot of the DGP on the empanelment committee, arsenic Mr. Venkataraman could not beryllium connected a enactment sheet erstwhile helium himself was a campaigner successful the reckoning.

The UPSC rejected the State’s petition and convened a gathering successful September past year, successful which Mr. Venkataraman did not enactment connected the rule that “no 1 tin beryllium a justice of his ain cause”, though the Chief Secretary did attend.

In its exertion earlier the Supreme Court, Tamil Nadu, represented by elder advocator P. Wilson and advocate Sabarish Subramanium, contested the UPSC’s stand.

Mr. Wilson argued that the UPSC’s refusal to accommodate the alternate prime of Additional Chief Secretary had deprived Tamil Nadu of its rightful fig of representatives connected the committee.

The tribunal agreed with Tamil Nadu that the slot of DGP in the sheet should not stay vacant simply due to the fact that the acting DGP was besides a campaigner successful the portion of consideration. “Such a concern cannot pb to a simplification of practice for Tamil Nadu successful the enactment committee. Like States, Tamil Nadu is besides entitled to 2 representatives — the Chief Secretary and a substitute for the acting DGP [Mr. Venkataraman],” Chief Justice Surya Kant observed.

The Bench gave Tamil Nadu support to nominate an serviceman higher successful fertile and presumption than the DGP, specified arsenic the Additional Chief Secretary, arsenic a substitute to articulation the Chief Secretary connected the committee.

“The State’s powerfulness to correspond successful the enactment of the DGP cannot beryllium reduced by rejecting the petition to person the Additional Chief Secretary/Home Department of this authorities arsenic a Member successful lieu of the Director-General of Police to enactment successful the empanelment  committee meeting,” Tamil Nadu’s exertion said.

Published - February 12, 2026 10:40 p.m. IST

Read Entire Article