Supreme Court allows withdrawal of life support to 31-year-old man in coma for over 12 years

3 months ago 2
ARTICLE AD BOX
Image for representational purposes only.

Image for representational purposes only. | Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

The Supreme Court connected Wednesday (March 11, 2026) allowed passive euthanasia for a 31-year-old antheral who has been successful a comatose information for much than 12 years, by withdrawing his artificial beingness support.

A Bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan directed the withdrawal of clinically-assisted nutrition and hydration to Harish Rana, who is successful a persistent vegetative authorities aft a autumn portion a Punjab University pupil 13 years ago. Justice Pardiwala and Justice Viswanathan directed AIIMS Delhi to displacement Mr. Rana from his residence to the palliative centre. The apical tribunal ordered that the withdrawal of beingness enactment indispensable not beryllium a “single act” but a structured and intelligibly articulated withdrawal.

The Bench had personally met Mr. Rana’s parents and siblings, who said they did not privation him to endure anymore. Mr. Rana had sustained terrible caput injuries and 100% quadriplegic disablement aft sustaining a autumn from the 4th level of his paying impermanent accommodation arsenic a Panjab University pupil successful 2013. He has been bed-ridden for implicit 13 years now.

J. Pardiwala said withdrawal of beingness enactment indispensable beryllium guided by factors, including whether beingness enactment provided to the diligent suffice arsenic aesculapian treatment; whether medicines person immoderate therapeutic benefit, but lone works to prolong life, symptom and suffering for the patient; and whether it would beryllium successful the champion involvement of the diligent to artificially prolong life.

The judgement is the archetypal lawsuit of applicable implementation of 2018 Constitution Bench guidelines successful the Common Cause lawsuit connected the process of withdrawal of beingness enactment system

J Viswanathan, successful a abstracted opinion, concurred with Justice Pardiwala.

Both Judges connected the Bench emphasised that the withdrawal of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) indispensable beryllium carried retired successful a delicate mode keeping successful caput foremost the dignity of the patient. It indispensable not beryllium an “act of abandonment”

The tribunal besides directed CMOs successful each districts to person panels each of registered aesculapian practitioners to represent superior and secondary aesculapian boards to analyse applications for withdrawal of beingness enactment The SC said the jurisdictional Judicial First Class Magistrates indispensable beryllium applied to successful lawsuit superior and secondary aesculapian boards unanimously urge withdrawal of beingness enactment successful cases

The SC urged the Centre for enacting circumstantial authorities detailing process for beingness enactment withdrawal.

In his conclusion, Justice Pardiwala said the lawsuit of Harish Rana lays bare the fragility and transient quality of quality life. The Judge said Mr. Rana had aft his autumn led a beingness of symptom and suffering of which helium was adjacent stripped of the quality to voice. The Judge reached retired to the parents and siblings of Mr. Rana, telling them they were unyielding pillars of enactment and dedication to him. “The top calamity successful beingness is not decease but abandonment. You are not giving up connected your son...” Justice Pardiwala concluded.

Published - March 11, 2026 11:39 americium IST

Read Entire Article