Stalin’s 2011 election: SC to examine if CDs showing alleged malpractice have been authenticated under Evidence Act

4 months ago 2
ARTICLE AD BOX
The tribunal  is proceeding  an entreaty  against the DMK leader, alleging that the enactment      utilized  its functionaries and wealth  powerfulness  to lure voters successful  his favour during the 2011 election. 

The tribunal is proceeding an entreaty against the DMK leader, alleging that the enactment utilized its functionaries and wealth powerfulness to lure voters successful his favour during the 2011 election.  | Photo Credit: PTI

The Supreme Court connected Thursday agreed to analyse if physics information successful the signifier of videos and photos, contained successful compact discs (CDs), allegedly showing corrupt practices committed up of the 2011 predetermination of existent Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin from the Kolathur Assembly constituency was certified arsenic authenticated nether Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act.

A Bench of Justices J.K. Maheshwari and Vijay Bishnoi said the tribunal would besides see if the contented of the CDs was proven beyond tenable doubt.

The tribunal is proceeding an entreaty filed by S.S. Duraisamy against Mr. Stalin, alleging that the DMK enactment utilized its functionaries and wealth powerfulness to lure voters successful his favour, amounting to corrupt signifier nether Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act.

The Madras High Court had dismissed the allegations raised by Mr. Duraisamy for deficiency of conclusive evidence. It had recovered that the CDs were infirm for not having complied with the “basic” request of a Section 65B certification. Mr. Duraisamy had contended that the DMK enactment had utilized the ‘Thirumangalam Formula’ to supply wealth to the voters successful a caller mode done assemblage feedings, courier service, currency successful newspapers, arathi sheet contributions, and slips to acquisition user items, etc. A goods conveyance had been caught with boxes of currency. However, the averments had not impressed the High Court successful June 2017.

It came to an “irresistible decision that determination was nary categorical averment that the archetypal responsive (Mr. Stalin) had fixed his consent to his enactment functionaries to bribe the voters and self-help radical members with a presumption to pull a misdeed of ‘corrupt practice’,” the High Court judgement read.

The High Court observed that Mr. Stalin could not perchance beryllium held “vicariously liable” for the alleged enactment of his enactment functionaries. “In respect to the allegation of wealth organisation by the archetypal Respondent’s enactment by adopting the ‘Thirumangalam Formula’, this tribunal points retired that determination is nary convincing, satisfactory, and acceptable impervious produced connected the broadside of the petitioner,” it had noted.

Published - January 22, 2026 11:38 p.m. IST

Read Entire Article