‘Soujanya case practically a closed one unless apex court intervenes’

7 months ago 2
ARTICLE AD BOX
The tract  wherever  past  rites of Soujanya were performed successful  Pangala of Dharmasthala.

The tract wherever past rites of Soujanya were performed successful Pangala of Dharmasthala. | Photo Credit: FILE PHOTO: H.S. MANJUNATH

While agitations were held astatine respective places successful the State connected Thursday seeking justness for Soujanya, who was raped and murdered 13 years agone (on October 9, 2012) successful Dharmasthala, elder prosecutors and advocates accidental that unless the Supreme Court passes an order, the Soujanya lawsuit is practically a closed one.

Soujanya was past seen getting down from a autobus astatine Mannasanka autobus halt astatine astir 4.30 p.m. connected the fateful time and walking towards her location successful Pangala successful Dharmasthala. When she did not instrumentality location till 7.30 p.m., household members and different villagers searched the country amid dense rainfall passim the night. But her assemblage was recovered successful the bushes the adjacent time successful fractional bare presumption with near manus tied to the histrion utilizing shawl of her assemblage uniform.

What station mortem said

The post-mortem study stated that aft raping, her cervix was pressed utilizing the tag attached to her assemblage individuality card, which resulted successful her death. After rape, mud was filled successful the little portion of the assemblage that was lacerated pursuing bleeding, the study stated.

The Belthangady constabulary did the archetypal investigation, earlier it was taken implicit by the Criminal Investigation Department and past the CBI.

Holding that nary of the circumstances connects Santosh Rao, lone accused successful the case, with the crime, the Special CBI Court Judge successful Bengaluru, connected June 16, 2023, acquitted him. The justice recommended enactment against officials who person erred successful the preliminary investigation.

Turning down the entreaty by CBI and besides request for de-novo probe made by the Soujanya’s household and Mr. Rao, the Karnataka High Court Division Bench comprising Justices Sreenivas Harish Kumar and J.M. Khazi, connected August 30, 2024, said, “Medical grounds cannot beryllium improved, and truthful besides the forensic evidence. It is doubtful that grounds that could not beryllium collected astatine the aureate hr is inactive available. No utile intent would beryllium served adjacent if reinvestigation is permitted.”

PIL rejected

Rejecting the pubic involvement litigation petition seeking de-novo probe of the case, Karnataka High Court Chief Justice Prasanna B Varale and Justice Krishna S. Dixit, successful their bid connected September 8, 2023, said. “... the undesirable consequences of accepting contention of the petitioner for a de novo probe needs nary research: nary national adjudged guiltless aft a owed proceedings would beryllium harmless arsenic a subordinate of civilian society, should his acquittal beryllium acceptable speech and caller probe oregon proceedings beryllium directed successful PIL jurisdiction simply due to the fact that determination is nationalist agitation. Similarly, the civilian nine shall not beryllium safe, should an bid of condemnation secured by the State aft full-fledged proceedings beryllium acceptable astatine naught and yet the convict beryllium acceptable escaped lone due to the fact that of the argued societal unrest and that the radical are violently thronging the nationalist streets.”

A elder pubic authoritative and a elder advocate, some from Mangaluru, who did not privation to beryllium named, told The Hindu that Soujanya lawsuit cannot beryllium reopened unless determination is bid of the apex court. The officials of SIT probing the alleged Dharmasthala wide burials lawsuit person besides made this wide to persons seeking the SIT to person a relook into the case.

Published - October 09, 2025 07:18 p.m. IST

Read Entire Article