7 months ago
1
The Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Police person registered lawsuit against 5 persons, including a Senior Revenue Inspector and a Village Administrative Officer, for allegedly preparing fraudulent documents for illegally taking possession of 3.70 hectare (9.14 acre) onshore belonging to a woman.
According to the complainant A. Pappathiammal of Muthukrishnapuram here, she owned a ‘grama natham’ spot with an grade of 3.70 hectares astatine Maappillaiyoorani colony connected Thoothukudi outskirts and the ‘grama natham’ patta for this spot was issued successful her favour connected February 5, 1996. When 1 S. Madasamy Pandian tried to instrumentality power of this property, Ms. Pappathiammal, who had constructed a hut connected this spot and was paying tax, filed a suit earlier Principal District Munsif Court for injunction restraining him with the possession and enjoyment of the property.
After the Principal District Munsif Court’s verdict went successful her favour, Madasamy Pandian preferred an entreaty earlier the Subordinate Court, Thoothukud, which besides confirmed the judgement of Principal District Munsif. His entreaty earlier Madurai Bench of Madras High Court excessively went successful favour of Ms. Pappathiammal and Madasamy Pandian did not similar an entreaty against the bid of Madurai Bench of Madras High Court.
Against this backdrop, Madasamy’s woman M. Elangamani of Tharuvaikulam, her relatives elder gross inspector S. Muthusaravanan of Tharuvaikulam, his woman M. Petchiammal, and M. Muthu Umayanan, besides from Tharuvaikulam, conspired with A. Rajesh Kannan, past Village Administrative Officer of Maappillaiyoorani to make fake papers and included the sanction of Elangamani successful associated patta. Rajesh Kannan besides issued an enjoyment certificate stating that Elangamani had been enjoying 1.55 cents successful the spot of Ms. Pappathiammal and that Elangamani possessed an asbestos-sheeted location there.
Even though Rajesh Kannan, having custody of gross records and known good that the spot was ‘grama natham’ being enjoyed by Ms. Pappaathiammal, helium colluded with Elangamani, Muthusaravanan, Petchimmal and Muthu Umayanan and gave the ‘enjoyment certificate’ successful favour of Elangamani.
With the fabricated document, Muthu Saravanan prepared a merchantability papers for this 1.55 cents onshore and Elangamani transferred the spot successful favour of Muthu Umayanan. Muthu Saravanan was the witnesser to this merchantability deed executed successful 2020. Subsequently, Muthu Umayanan alienated the 1.55 cents and different 1.95 cents successful different onshore successful favour of Muthu Saravanan’s woman Petchiammal, for which besides Muthu Saravanan was the witnesser by attesting the documents astatine the clip of registration.
Since the each the 5 including 2 authorities servants person colluded to perpetrate the crime, the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption constabulary person registered lawsuit nether Section 120 B (criminal conspiracy), 464 (making a mendacious document), 465 (punishment for forgery), 468 (forgery for the intent of cheating), 471 (fraudulently oregon dishonestly utilizing forged papers arsenic genuine) of Indian Penal Code Section 13 (2) work with 13 (1) a of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
