The Madras High Court, connected Tuesday (March 17, 2026), directed a Chennai metropolis civilian tribunal to instrumentality up an intra enactment quality case betwixt Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK) laminitis S. Ramadoss and his estranged lad R. Anbumani aft May 10 erstwhile the process of the Legislative Assembly elections successful Tamil Nadu and Puducherry would person concluded.
Justice T.V. Thamilselvi passed the orders aft concurring with elder counsel N.L. Rajah, representing PMK wide caput Vadivel Ravanan belonging to Dr. Anbumani’s faction, that it mightiness not beryllium due for the courts to determine intra enactment disputes aft the notification of elections. The justice refrained from instantly lifting a enactment imposed connected the metropolis civilian tribunal proceedings.
Dr. Ramadoss had filed a civilian suit to to state him arsenic the president of the enactment and injunct his estranged lad R. Anbumani from utilizing the enactment name, flag, emblem and predetermination symbol. In the plaint, helium claimed the enactment presidentship of his lad had expired and yet, helium was continuing to cling connected to the station illegally. The laminitis besides claimed helium had been elected arsenic the incumbent president.
The suit had been filed successful the sanction of PMK, represented by Dr. Ramadoss and Dr. Anbumani unsocial had been named arsenic 1 of the defendants isolated from the Election Commission of India. Hence, an impleading petition was filed successful the sanction of PMK, represented by its wide caput Mr. Ravanan, to assistance the tribunal successful taking a close determination and to apprise it of the facts regarding enactment leadership.
However, claiming the metropolis civilian tribunal had not taken up the impleading petition for proceeding astatine each and was alternatively inclined to perceive the interim injunction applications filed by the enactment founder, Mr. Ravanan moved the High Court by mode of a civilian revision petition and sought a absorption to the civilian tribunal to dispose of the impleading petition wrong a clip framework and earlier proceeding the injunction applications.

In an affidavit filed successful enactment of the revision petition, Mr. Ravanan said, helium and Dr. Anbumani were elected arsenic wide caput and president of the enactment connected May 28, 2022 and their tenure had been extended till August 1, 2026 done a solution passed by the wide assembly connected August 9, 2025. Therefore, the Election Commission of India had rightly recognised their presumption arsenic the office-bearers of the party, helium contended.
He besides said, the 87-year-old laminitis of the enactment lone had an advisory relation sans immoderate administrative authorization successful the enactment affairs. The laminitis could besides not record immoderate lawsuit successful the sanction of the enactment without a valid authorisation. Yet, the suit earlier the metropolis civilian tribunal had been filed successful the sanction of PMK, represented by its founder, the petitioner complained and said lone the wide caput could record immoderate lawsuit successful the sanction of the party.
Justice Thamilselvi had entertained the revision petition connected March 12, 2026 and granted an interim enactment for each further proceedings pending earlier the civilian court. Thereafter, Dr. Ramadoss had filed an exertion for vacating the interim stay. When the plea was heard connected Tuesday (March 17), Mr. Rajah referred to definite Supreme Court decisions which caution courts against interfering with the predetermination process aft the notification of polls.
He besides said, 2 candidates belonging to Dr. Anbumani faction of PMK had already filed their nominations successful Puducherry connected Tuesday. “Therefore, each these disputes could beryllium heard aft the completion of the elections successful some Tamil Nadu and Puducherry,” helium said.

2 months ago
2


