1 day ago
1
Questions proceed to situation Osmania University’s introspection strategy aft hundreds of Law students, who were allegedly declared failed successful the third-semester LLB examinations, were aboriginal declared passed pursuing revaluation. A study connected the contention was archetypal published successful these columns connected Monday (June 8).
The contented emerged aft revised results published connected the university’s website connected June 2 showed important changes successful grades crossed respective reply scripts.
According to an audit conducted by a pupil utilizing archetypal and revised results, much than 800 taxable papers recorded people improvements, with immoderate reportedly moving from a failing people to higher grades aft revaluation. The findings person raised concerns among students astir the consistency and accuracy of the archetypal valuation process.
All India Lawyers’ Union and its pupil wing, Law Students’ Federation of India, alleged that the contented progressive ample numbers of students crossed respective colleges who were initially declared failed contempt performing good successful different subjects. They besides questioned the request to wage revaluation fees erstwhile important changes were aboriginal made to results and demanded greater transparency from the university.
Responding to the concerns, Registrar of Osmania University G. Naresh Reddy connected Thursday (June 11) stated that the valuation strategy is transparent and supported by a unafraid integer mechanism. The substance was reviewed astatine a high-level gathering convened by Vice Chancellor Kumar Molugaram.
According to the university, results of 5,831 students were announced, of which astir 86% were satisfied with their archetypal marks and lone astir 14% applied for revaluation. After the revaluation process, astir 300 students crossed the assemblage received insignificant revisions successful their marks oregon grades, constituting 5.14% of the full pupil colonisation whose results were declared.
Controller of Examinations stated that the revisions were not constricted to immoderate azygous subject but were dispersed crossed assorted courses and programmes. The assemblage further attributed the revisions to differences successful world judgement inherent successful subjective examinations and said revised marks are considered lone erstwhile the saltation exceeds 10%, which it described arsenic a safeguard to guarantee fairness and world integrity. It besides assured that strict enactment would beryllium taken against evaluators recovered negligent.
However, the clarification did not straight code cardinal concerns raised by students, including reports of steep people jumps from F to A oregon B, the alleged failures successful Labour Law-I, the accuracy of claims regarding implicit 800 revised papers, and whether students should beryllium reimbursed revaluation fees wherever important changes suggest errors successful the archetypal evaluation.
