6 months ago
2
Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah connected Monday (December 22, 2025) dismissed Opposition to the Karnataka Hate Speech and Hate Crimes (Prevention) Bill, 2025, asserting that lone those who indulge successful provocative speeches are opposing the legislation.
Responding to questions from reporters successful Mysuru, Mr. Siddaramaiah said nary transgression lawsuit would beryllium registered unnecessarily if nary provocative code was made, and questioned the request for the BJP to reason the Bill.
Asked whether BJP leaders were engaging successful specified speeches, the Chief Minister invoked a fashionable Kannada idiom to suggest a blameworthy conscience, remarking—loosely translated—why 1 would consciousness compelled to cheque one’s enarthrosis if idiosyncratic simply called retired a “pumpkin thief”.
Reacting to the BJP’s allegation that the Bill was drafted to people circumstantial individuals, Mr. Siddaramaiah said the instrumentality would use uniformly to members of each governmental parties, including the Congress, BJP, JD(S), Communist parties, and others. “Why are you opposing it? Does hatred code assistance support bid successful society?” helium asked.
Editorial | Playing to the gallery: On the Karnataka Hate Speech and Hate Crimes (Prevention) Bill, 2025
He said the Bill was being implemented to safeguard bid and fraternity, noting that hatred code had accrued successful caller times. The legislation, helium said, was aimed astatine curbing this trend, adding that the BJP’s beardown absorption stemmed from its indulgence successful hatred speech.
Gruha Lakshmi funds
Responding to questions connected the government’s nonaccomplishment to merchandise 2 months of Gruha Lakshmi assistance for February and March, Mr. Siddaramaiah assured that the pending amounts would beryllium disbursed aft owed examination.
Dismissing allegations of misappropriation levelled by the Opposition, helium pointed retired that the strategy had already been implemented for 23 months. “When wealth is transferred straight to the beneficiaries’ slope accounts, however does the question of misappropriation arise?” helium asked, adding that the funds had not yet been released and truthful could not person been siphoned off.
