On measuring freedom of the press in India

1 day ago 1
ARTICLE AD BOX
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has not addressed a property   league  arsenic  Prime Minister. After a associated  quality  with U.S. President Donald Trump, helium  took a mates  of questions successful  February 2025.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has not addressed a property league arsenic Prime Minister. After a associated quality with U.S. President Donald Trump, helium took a mates of questions successful February 2025. | Photo Credit: Reuters

A diligent complaining of symptom tin beryllium asked to quantify it connected a standard of 10 — a signifier communal successful the West but inactive uncommon successful India. There are experts who “aim to profoundly analyse happiness measurement done biomedical signals, utilizing psychophysiological methods to objectify the happiness experience.” Objective, cosmopolitan facts are expected to beryllium the ground of absorption and governance.

The Norwegian writer who wanted to inquire Prime Minister Narendra Modi a question prefaced it by saying that her state had the freest property successful the world, citing the World Press Freedom Index prepared annually by Reporters Without Borders. Press freedom, and adjacent democracy, tin seemingly beryllium ranked. India is ranked 157 successful the World Press Freedom Index. Ukraine is astatine 55, Qatar astatine 75, Burkina Faso astatine 110, Oman astatine 127, Kuwait astatine 136 — countries immoderate of which bash not adjacent clasp a pro forma predetermination fertile higher connected property state than India, according to this report.

Norway is fig one. But what the ranking does not instrumentality into relationship is the unfiltered racism of an seemingly escaped property — specified arsenic a Norwegian mainstream paper that portrayed Mr. Modi arsenic a snake charmer, an age-old trope to picture India. The rankers person themselves clarified that the prime of journalism is not a criterion. The racism of the freest property does not impact its standing.

Mr. Modi has not addressed a property league arsenic Prime Minister. After a associated quality with U.S. President Donald J. Trump, helium took a mates of questions successful February 2025. Mr. Trump, for his part, routinely seeks retired confrontational interviews to marque his point, portion simultaneously seeking to delegitimise the media. Press conferences and probing interviews person go uncommon crossed India’s leadership. No person wants to instrumentality questions — whether successful the legislature oregon the media. Political connection has go a one-way thoroughfare successful which the main histrion broadcasts without the inconvenience of being contested — that applies arsenic overmuch to respective Opposition leaders arsenic well.

The contestations wrong the media abstraction are often a reflection of society, and authorities power of the media is an hold of the power the authorities seeks to enforce crossed different domains of people’s lives — movement, thinking, learning, and the mingling of populations. In Norway, the media, the nine and the authorities stock broadly the aforesaid consensus. Of its 55 lakh people, 95 per cent talk Norwegian and 60 per cent are affiliated to the Church of Norway. A mostly homogenous state wherever the media does not necessitate to contention the authorities is not comparable to a large, divers state riven by conflicting viewpoints astir everything, and wherever the authorities is simultaneously trying to power the reasoning of its people. Political contestation successful specified a nine produces a multitude of media narratives — and a multitude of pressures.

That said, those who question to disregard Western standards arsenic irrelevant are curiously selective successful their approach. They would disregard the Press Freedom Index but successful the aforesaid enactment observe immoderate random ranking connected Ease of Doing Business, oregon a overseas country’s nationalist honour conferred connected their leader. The convenience of the dismissal gives it away. Rankings exist. They are often methodologically dubious, often corrupted by subjective factors and sometimes by outright prejudice. No planetary ranking is required to found that the Indian media is nether terrible accent — from marketplace forces and from authorities measures alike. Equally, nary magnitude of good people tin prolong the statement that Kuwait belongs acold supra India connected immoderate honorable measurement of property freedom. The index’s ain methodology undermines its ain conclusions astatine the extremes.

The amended statement is not that rankings are worthless but that they are blunt instruments — utile for identifying wide patterns, unreliable arsenic precise judgements.

Published - May 22, 2026 01:27 americium IST

Read Entire Article