3 months ago
1
Former Chief Minister O. Panneerselvam, who recently joined the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), has filed an exertion earlier the Madras High Court seeking permission to retreat an predetermination petition filed by him successful 2024 challenging the victory of Ramanathapuram Lok Sabha subordinate K. Navas Kani of Indian Union Muslim League (IUML), an state of the DMK.
Justice CV. Karthikeyan connected Tuesday directed the applicant to see the Election Commission of India (ECI) arsenic 1 of the respondents to the plea. He directed the Registry to database the permission exertion again aft the indispensable amendments get carried retired by the applicant’s counsel P. Rajalakshmi.
After his expulsion from the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) successful 2022 owed to differences with its wide caput Edappadi K. Palaniswami, Mr. Panneerselvam had contested the Lok Sabha predetermination from Ramanathapuram constituency arsenic an autarkic candidate supported by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Then, the ECI had allotted him ‘jackfruit’ symbol.
Interestingly, 5 different autarkic candidates with the sanction Panneerselvam contested successful Ramanathapuram successful 2024 thereby creating an apprehension of large disorder being caused among the voters portion exercising their franchise. Further, AIADMK campaigner Jayaperumal was besides successful the fray successful the constituency and helium had contested nether the party’s ‘two leaves’ symbol.
When the votes were counted connected June 4, 2024, Mr. Kani was declared elected by a immense borderline of 1.66 lakh votes. He had secured 5,09,664 votes arsenic against 3,42,882 votes polled by his nearest rival Mr. Panneerselvam. The AIADMK campaigner had polled conscionable 99,780 votes. Thereafter, the erstwhile Chief Minister chose to situation the triumph by mode of an predetermination petition.
What did the predetermination petition say?
He had filed the predetermination petition connected aggregate grounds including suppression of facts successful the predetermination affidavit filed by the elected candidate. The MP was accused of not having disclosed successful his predetermination affidavit that helium was the manager successful S.T. Couriers Private Limited, Madras Media Private Limited and Pelita Nasi Kandar Private Limited and besides the remuneration helium was receiving from those enterprises.
The predetermination petitioner had besides wondered however the MP could person obtained a indebtedness of ₹91.75 lakh from his son, arsenic claimed successful the predetermination affidavit filed on with the information papers, erstwhile the latter’s income successful the past 5 years was lone astir ₹20 lakh. Therefore, Mr. Panneerselvam had urged the High Court to acceptable speech the predetermination of Mr. Kani connected the crushed of having submitted a mendacious declaration.
Though the MP filed an exertion successful 2024 to cull the predetermination petition without making him acquisition the ordeal of facing the proceedings proceedings, Justice Karthikeyan had dismissed that exertion successful April 2025 aft observing the veracity of the allegations regarding suppression of facts, successful the predetermination affidavit, could beryllium ascertained lone aft conducting a afloat fledged trial.
“The parties indispensable beryllium granted an accidental to enactment guardant their views by gracing the witnesser box. It would not beryllium an workout successful futility (as claimed by the MP successful his plea to cull the predetermination petition astatine the threshold) but alternatively it would beryllium a task to observe the close facts,” the justice had observed.
Then, the justice had besides said, the genuineness of the allegations levelled agains the MP could beryllium recovered retired lone connected investigation of oral and documentary grounds to beryllium adduced by some sides during the people of trial. He observed the MP could nutrient grounds to disprove the allegations, alternatively of seeking to cull the predetermination petition successful limine.
