After a seven-year ban, the erstwhile Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) drafted caller advertisement bylaws with precocious hopes of generating ₹500 crore successful revenue. However, the caller bylaws person failed to impressment advertizing firms.
The advertisement tenders floated by the BBMP successful the past week of July were cancelled by the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) pursuing a deficiency of involvement from bidders, a well-placed root successful the civic assemblage told The Hindu. Although the pre-bid gathering was attended by implicit 50 companies, lone 2 firms expressed involvement successful participating.
The BBMP had divided the tenders into 8 packages, meaning each steadfast would clasp advertizing rights successful 1 circumstantial portion of the civic body.
“Although 2 companies showed interest, neither of them completed the tender process. We couldn’t proceed with the bidding,” the root said. However, officials had anticipated the firms’ disinterest.
Modelled connected Delhi’s advertizing laws, the Karnataka government’s advertisement bylaws required the winning bidder to wage an upfront interest adjacent to 5 times the bid amount. This peculiar clause was flagged by the firms during the pre-bid meeting. The rule, considered a “costly affair”, discouraged smaller companies from participating adjacent earlier the process began.
Setback for passageway roads
This is simply a setback for the State government’s big-ticket Tunnel Road task arsenic well. B-SMILE, which has received a authorisation from the Housing and Urban Development Corporation (HUDCO), had promised to transportation advertisement revenue, on with premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) revenue, towards indebtedness involvement payments. Now, with firms showing disinterest, the onus is connected the GBA to travel up with rules that pull and promote advertizing companies, particularly with the indebtedness authorisation astatine stake.
Advertisers’ concerns
An advertizing institution proprietor noted that civic assemblage tenders person traditionally attracted wide information from section firms, but this one’s “unnecessarily precocious costs” kept them away.
“There were besides method flaws, specified arsenic constricted clip to get the No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the advertizing section and the lack of wide instructions connected however to use for caller advertizing rights,” helium said, adding that the caller bylaws required firms to get caller rights. According to GBA sources, lone 10 firms applied for these caller advertizing rights.
Additionally, obtaining an NOC from the advertizing section required the submission of humanities documents to verify the company’s way record, thing astir section firms lacked. Similar concerns were raised earlier the civic body.
Adding caller rules
The root told The Hindu that the civic assemblage has present gone backmost to the drafting committee to framework caller rules.
“All the requisitions from companies person been taken into relationship and the civic assemblage is revisiting the laws to place gaps. Changes tin beryllium expected wherever perfectly necessary,” the root said, adding that the revisions purpose to code flaws successful the existing bylaws.
Meanwhile, section firms are intimately watching developments and anticipation the GBA volition code the high-cost concerns and marque country for smaller players.
The GBA is yet to determine who volition interval the caller tenders, the recently formed corporations oregon the GBA.

6 months ago
2







