Mere contemplation of disciplinary proceeding is not bar for promotion: Karnataka High Court

5 months ago 1
ARTICLE AD BOX
The High Court of Karnataka

The High Court of Karnataka | Photo Credit:

Promotional prospects of an different eligible authorities worker cannot beryllium sealed oregon deferred solely connected the ground of “mere contemplation of disciplinary action” successful the lack of work of a complaint expanse of disciplinary proceeding connected the worker connected the day of appraisal for promotion, the High Court of Karnataka has ruled.

The departmental proceedings, the tribunal said, are deemed to commence lone upon the ceremonial issuance of a complaint sheet, and “neither the enactment of suspension nor the issuance of a amusement origin announcement has the effect of initiating disciplinary proceedings.”

“The important day for determination of the eligibility is the day connected which the Departmental Promotion Committee convenes to measure promotion. Only if, connected that date, the serviceman suffers disqualification by virtuousness of an already issued complaint sheet, tin his lawsuit beryllium legitimately withheld,” said Justice M. Nagaprasanna, portion allowing a petition filed by Maruthi Rao, an adjunct accounts serviceman of Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation (KPTCL).

The petitioner’s lawsuit for the promotion to the station of accounts serviceman was assessed by the Department Promotion Committee connected April 16, 2018, and aboriginal the determination connected his promotion was kept successful a sealed screen for the crushed that “the disciplinary proceedings are contemplated” against him portion promoting others, including his juniors.

The tribunal noted that the petitioner was suspended connected August 22, 2014, and suspension was revoked November 12, 2014, and the complaint expanse was served connected him lone connected October 29, 2021, astir 4 years aft helium was considered for promotion by the committee. “Though suspension is ne'er a disablement for information of promotion, adjacent that was not successful subsistence erstwhile helium was considered for promotion,” the tribunal pointed out.

“The complaint expanse oregon complaint memo, surfacing years aft the Departmental Promotion Committee convened for appraisal to see for promotion, cannot retrospectively deprive the petitioner of a promotion that helium was rightfully owed and ought to person been granted upon the just appraisal of his practice for promotion,” the tribunal said.

The tribunal directed the KPTCL to beforehand the petitioner to the station of accounts serviceman with effect from April 16, 2018 wrong 8 weeks.

Published - December 08, 2025 07:39 p.m. IST

Read Entire Article