7 months ago
2
The Supreme Court connected Thursday refused to interfere with a Madras High Court Division Bench bid permitting the State of Tamil Nadu to transportation retired works related to the improvement of 4 ponds situated successful the Madras Race Club grounds successful nationalist interest, but restricted the authorities from creating “permanent structures” connected the spot beyond what was required for an eco-park.
A Bench of Justices P.S. Narasimha and R. Mahadevan was dealing with a plea filed by the Madras Race Club, represented by elder advocator Gopal Subramanium, challenging the Division Bench bid of October 22 which modified an interim absorption of presumption quo pronounced by a Single Judge of the High Court connected July 4.
On September 6, 2024, the Tamil Nadu authorities had issued an bid prematurely terminating the 99-year-long lease fixed to the Madras Race Club successful 1946 for 160.86 acres of onshore astatine Guindy successful Chennai.
The nine had instituted a suit against the State against the termination of the lease and had sought the alleviation of a imperishable injunction against eviction. The Single Judge had granted an interim alleviation of status quo. On August 18, it reserved orders connected the Madras Race Club’s exertion to restrain the authorities from interfering with its possession.
The State government, represented by elder advocator P. Wilson, did not relent, and challenged the interim bid of status quo successful an entreaty earlier a Division Bench of the High Court. The State had argued that the cognition of bid of status quo would impede the works relating to improvement and strengthening of ponds arsenic flood power and rainwater preservation measures successful nationalist interest, isolated from the projected eco-park.
In response, the Division Bench had modified the status quo bid of the Single Judge and permitted the “State to transportation retired each works relating to strengthening/development of pond and immoderate different task of nationalist involvement and the nine shall cooperate and not obstruct specified work”.
On Thursday, the Supreme Court, successful a petition filed by the Madras Race Club, clarified that the information “and immoderate different task of nationalist interest” successful the Division Bench bid of October 22 would not entitle the authorities to “create imperishable structures” which “shall not beryllium much than what is required for an eco-park”.
The apex tribunal Bench further noted that the petitioner (the Madras Race Club) would beryllium entitled to determination an exertion for further modifications. It noted that the Single Judge, who had reserved orders connected August 18, would dispose of the exertion of the Madras Race Club uninfluenced by the observations of the Division Bench.
During the hearing, Mr. Subramanium, for the Madras Race Club, submitted that the nine had volunteered for the implicit improvement of the 4 ponds situated connected 80 acres of the 160-acre premises, but the Division Bench had expanded the scope to see “other project” successful its October 22 order. It was “perplexing” to person a absorption for status quo modified by the Division Bench successful an entreaty erstwhile the Single Judge had already reserved for orders, Mr. Subramanium said. It was “distressing” to enactment that 1 of the judges connected the Division Bench, who had refused to recuse from proceeding the case, had passed adverse orders against the nine successful 2023, and upheld an upward revision of rent to beryllium realised from the Madras Race Club, helium said. The justice had besides appeared arsenic a lawyer against the Madras Race Club.
Senior advocates Mukul Rohatgi and A.M. Singhvi, appearing for the authorities on with Mr. Wilson, termed the Madras Race Club’s submissions against the justice “an unfair accusation”. Mr. Singhvi said the “other task of nationalist interest” mentioned successful the October 22 bid was the eco-park successful question. “We are not making immoderate commercialized buildings oregon authorities offices. Tenders are for a fantastic eco-park connected the lines of Japanese gardens,” Mr. Singhvi explained.
He urged the apex tribunal to not to usage the word ‘permanent structures’, saying this would exposure the State to contempt enactment adjacent if they tried to physique a span successful the eco-park. This submission led the Bench to clarify successful its bid that the operation of immoderate imperishable operation should beryllium restricted and intrinsic to the eco-park.
Mr. Wilson highlighted that the improvement of the 4 ponds would enactment arsenic a important buffer against flooding successful 4 areas, including Velachery, Medavakkam, Alandur, and Madipakkam, during dense rains.
