1 week ago
3
The Madras High Court connected Friday (June 5, 2026) refused to assistance an interim enactment connected a circular issued by the Director of Private Schools connected June 1, 2026, which instructed each backstage schools successful Tamil Nadu to show their interest structures connected their announcement boards.
Justice M. Dhandapani rejected the plea for interim alleviation and said, helium would similar to instrumentality up for last hearing, aft 2 weeks, a writ petition filed by All India Private Educational Institutions Association, represented by its wide caput K. Palaniappan of Chennai.
The petitioner relation had challenged the June 1 circular, arsenic good arsenic Tamil Nadu Information Commission’s (TNIC) May 25, 2026, order, based connected which the circular had been issued. It had urged the tribunal to quash the TNIC’s bid and the circular and enactment them until the disposal of the main case.
What is the lawsuit about?
The tribunal was informed that an idiosyncratic named M. Liyakath Ali had successful 2022 filed an exertion nether the Right to Information Act of 2005, seeking accusation regarding the interest operation of backstage schools. The exertion was addressed to the Public Information Officer (PIO)/Personal Assistant to Coimbatore Chief Educational Officer.
The PIO forwarded the exertion to the District Education Officer (DEO) who, successful turn, forwarded it further to the idiosyncratic schools successful the district. Aggrieved implicit it, the applicant had taken the substance connected 2nd entreaty earlier the TNIC and complained astir the accusation not having been fixed to him.
The TNIC issued wide-ranging directions connected the substance connected May 25, 2026. It was successful compliance of those directions that the Director of Private Schools had issued the circular nether challenge, mandating each backstage schools to show their interest structures connected their announcement boards, the petitioner relation said.
Assailing the TNIC’s bid and the circular connected assorted grounds, the relation said, specified directions and instructions had been issued without analysing whether the RTI Act would use to backstage unaided acquisition institutions and whether those institutions would autumn nether the explanation of the word ‘public authority.’
The petitioner’s counsel said, it besides had to beryllium analysed whether the TNIC had exceeded its jurisdiction nether the RTI Act by passing suo motu directions of a legislative and regulatory quality amounting to a wide argumentation mandate for each backstage schools functioning successful the State.
After proceeding the preliminary arguments, the justice decided to instrumentality up the writ petition for last disposal pursuant to the filing of antagonistic affidavits by the respondents.
