Madras High Court modifies stalker’s death sentence to life imprisonment

5 months ago 1
ARTICLE AD BOX
The Madras High Court confirmed the condemnation  of a stalker for pushing a pistillate   assemblage   pupil  to decease  from a moving  bid     successful  Chennai successful  2022 but modified his decease  condemnation   to beingness  imprisonment .

The Madras High Court confirmed the condemnation of a stalker for pushing a pistillate assemblage pupil to decease from a moving bid successful Chennai successful 2022 but modified his decease condemnation to beingness imprisonment . | Photo Credit: K. Pichumani

The Madras High Court connected Thursday (November 27, 2025) confirmed the condemnation of a stalker for pushing a pistillate assemblage pupil to decease from a moving bid successful Chennai successful 2022 but modified his decease condemnation to beingness imprisonment and ordered helium would not beryllium entitled for remission until helium completes 20 years of incarceration.

A Division Bench comprising Justices N. Sathish Kumar and M. Jothiraman agreed with State Public Prosecutor (SPP) Hasan Mohamed Jinnah that the offence committed by the stalker D. Sathish was sedate successful quality and helium had nary close to instrumentality the beingness of a young pistillate who had rejected his emotion proposal.

At the aforesaid time, the Judges besides concurred with elder counsel R. John Sathyan, representing the convict, that the punishment indispensable beryllium reformative and not solely retributive successful quality and therefore, courts indispensable follow a balancing attack portion determining the sentence.

“It is to beryllium noted that the rule of reformation has gained value successful the transgression jurisprudence and is simply a important origin portion awarding condemnation to the accused. The courts person to see the anticipation of reintegration of the accused offender into nine peculiarly erstwhile the anticipation of reformation of an accused is precocious considering the factors specified arsenic age, nary erstwhile transgression past and genuine remorse indicating a important alteration of caput of the accused,” the Bench wrote.

Authoring the verdict, Justice Kumar besides said: “A cautious investigation of the lawsuit connected manus would amusement that the lawsuit connected manus would not autumn wrong the class of ‘rarest of rare’ cases. When determination is simply a anticipation of reformation, the facet of reformation indispensable beryllium fixed primacy unless it is intelligibly ruled retired by producing capable materials.”

Published - November 28, 2025 08:35 americium IST

Read Entire Article