Madras High Court dismisses plea seeking ordinary leave to convict to undergo fertility treatment

1 week ago 1
ARTICLE AD BOX

The mentation of reformation is focused connected the convict and that has thing to bash with the tendency of a convict to person a child, which for nary responsibility connected its portion is going to transportation a stigma passim its life, Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has said.

A Division Bench of Justices N. Anand Venkatesh and K.K. Ramakrishnan made the reflection portion dismissing a petition filed by Jalani of Sivaganga territory who sought assistance of mean permission to her hubby I. Muthumani, sentenced to beingness imprisonment successful the Kachanatham caste murders case.

The Special Court for Exclusive Trial of SC/ST Act Cases sentenced Muthumani to beingness imprisonment. The verdict was confirmed by the High Court. No entreaty has been filed earlier the Supreme Court. The convict is lodged successful Madurai Central Prison.

The petitioner submitted a practice to the situation authorities seeking mean permission to her hubby connected the crushed that she wanted to person a kid done him, and for this intent they had to acquisition fertility treatment. However, the situation authorities rejected the practice citing beingness menace and instrumentality and bid issue.

The State submitted that the permission nether Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982, could not beryllium claimed arsenic a substance of right. It was lone a privilege fixed to a convict and, therefore, unless the conditions were satisfied nether the Rules, mean permission could not beryllium granted to the convict.

The Division Bench said some the petitioner and the convict were conveniently ignoring the close of a kid to beryllium born. The kid would turn up with a stigma that it was the kid of a idiosyncratic serving beingness condemnation for having committed triple murder.

The tribunal could not crook a unsighted oculus to this world and, therefore, portion balancing the close of the petitioner and the child, the tribunal was much acrophobic astir the payment of the kid which would look the consequences psychologically exerted by society. Neither the petitioner nor the convict would person the close to spot the kid successful specified an unfortunate presumption close done its life, the tribunal said and dismissed the petition.

Published - May 13, 2026 08:30 p.m. IST

Read Entire Article