Madras HC grants relief to police personnel who were part of task force formed to catch Veerappan

2 weeks ago 1
ARTICLE AD BOX
The tribunal  was proceeding  the appeals filed by the constabulary  unit   against an bid   of the Single Bench of the court.

The tribunal was proceeding the appeals filed by the constabulary unit against an bid of the Single Bench of the court. | Photo Credit: R. ASHOK

Granting alleviation to constabulary unit who were portion of the Special Task Force (STF) constituted by the authorities to nab wood brigand Veerappan, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court said the State govt. should not retrieve the benefits derived by them during their work arsenic Sub-Inspectors (SIs) from the day of their promotion.

The tribunal was proceeding the appeals filed by the constabulary unit against an bid of the Single Bench of the court. The appellants challenged a G.O. and the consequential bid reverting them to a little post. The Single Bench of the tribunal had dismissed their petitions. The appellants were primitively appointed arsenic constables successful 2002. They were promoted arsenic Naik successful 2004. Thereafter, wrong a abbreviated span of astir 5 months, they were promoted arsenic Havildar connected a impermanent basis. At the clip of promoting the appellants connected impermanent basis, it was intelligibly indicated that the promotions were purely connected a impermanent basis, and the aforesaid volition not confer immoderate close oregon merit to further promotion etc.,

It was further informed that their promotions were ordered successful presumption of the exigencies to capable up vacancies arising owed to exodus of unit connected transportation from TSP VI Battalion to City/District AR and this impermanent promotion shall not confer immoderate close oregon merit to further promotion.

Following the sidesplitting of Veerappan and his pack successful 2004, the authorities issued a G.O., granting 1 signifier accelerated promotion to implicit 900 constabulary unit of assorted ranks. Later, the authorities issued a G.O successful 2007 clarifying the presumption that the accelerated promotion is not extended to accelerate seniority and indicated that the seniority betwixt the accelerated promotees and wide promotees successful the promoted class shall proceed to beryllium governed by their sheet position.

At nary signifier shall accelerated promotion confer accelerated consequential seniority connected an individual, since specified promotion is lone for 1 stage. The appellants who were granted accelerated promotion and promoted arsenic SIs were reverted to the fertile of Naik successful 2009 arsenic they were officiating lone connected a impermanent ground astatine the clip of assistance of accelerated promotion. The G.O. and the consequential reversion orders were challenged.

A Division Bench of Justices N. Sathish Kumar and M. Jothiraman said connected a combined speechmaking of the rules governing impermanent appointments and the archetypal promotion rules, it is evident that for promotion arsenic Naik, a campaigner indispensable person completed 2 years of work successful the fertile of Grade II Police Constable, and for promotion arsenic Havildar, helium indispensable beryllium an approved probationer successful the cadre of Naik.

However, the appellants were promoted arsenic Havildar from Naik wrong a abbreviated span, instantly aft their impermanent promotion and without being approved probationers, which is contrary to the rules. Therefore, simply due to the fact that accelerated promotions were mistakenly granted, the appellants cannot present contend that they are entitled to seniority connected that basis. Consequently, they were rightly reverted. Accelerated promotion is, successful fact, intended to beryllium granted lone against a substantive vacancy, the tribunal said.

The State told the tribunal that it had taken a basal that since the appellants already worked arsenic SIs and were eligible for regular promotion to the station lone from May 23, 2023, their positions would not beryllium reverted. The tribunal said it was of the presumption that since the promotion was wrongly granted by the State, and arsenic the appellants besides participated successful risky operations arsenic portion of the STF, each the benefits derived by the appellants during their work arsenic SIs from the day of their promotion should not beryllium recovered by the State.

Published - May 16, 2026 11:46 p.m. IST

Read Entire Article