Left parties condemn U.S. “aggression” in Venezuela

Left parties condemned the U.S. strikes connected Venezuela and the seizure of the country’s President Nicolás Maduro connected Saturday (January 3, 2026), with the Communist Party of India, the Communist Part of India (Marxist), and the All India Forward Bloc (AIFB) each issuing statements condemning the U.S. actions.

CPI(M) wide caput M.A. Baby condemned the U.S. action, calling it a “naked enactment of aggression”. Mr. Baby referred to a failed coup effort against past President Hugo Chávez successful 2002, characterising that effort arsenic a U.S.-backed effort that failed, and said that these strikes would besides extremity successful the aforesaid fate.

Also Read | Venezuela-U.S. tensions LIVE updates

“This is simply a unsighted usurpation of planetary laws,” Mr. Baby said, calling India’s soundlessness connected the strikes “doubtful”.

All India Forward Bloc wide caput G. Devarajan “unequivocally” condemned the strikes and said that the U.S. had “no moral, ineligible oregon governmental authorization to onslaught immoderate sovereign federation nether immoderate pretext,” adding that the AIFB demanded “immediate involution by the United Nations to condemn the U.S. aggression, halt each subject actions, and guarantee the information and beingness of the President of Venezuela.”

Communist Party of India wide caput D. Raja called the strikes “blatant and transgression subject aggression” connected the U.S.’ part, and said that they were “a gross usurpation of the UN Charter, planetary law, and the universally accepted principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity and non-interference.” In a station connected X, formerly Twitter, Mr. Baby called the strikes “an enactment of planetary terrorism,” terming the “capture” of Mr. Máduro and archetypal woman Cilia Flores arsenic “kidnapping”.

Mr. Raja declared that the CPI’s “firm solidarity with the Government and radical of Venezuela successful their conscionable conflict to support nationalist sovereignty … and the close to take their ain way of development.”