5 months ago
1
The Supreme Court took superior enactment of a Kerala authorities submission connected Friday (November 28, 2025) that Governor Rajendra Arlekar is “not looking” into a retired Supreme Court judge’s study connected long-pending assignment of regular Vice-Chancellors to 2 State-run universities, forwarded to him by the Chief Minister.
The Kerala Governor is the Chancellor of the 2 universities.
A Bench headed by Justice J.B. Pardiwala said the study from a erstwhile justice of the tribunal cannot beryllium treated by the Governor arsenic an “ordinary portion of paper” successful his capableness arsenic Chancellor.
Justice Pardiwala is the writer of the August 8 judgement successful the Tamil Nadu Governor case. That verdict fixed timelines for Governors to woody with pending State Bills waiting for assent. The judgement had led to a Presidential Reference successful which the Supreme Court clarified that Governors cannot beryllium tied to clip frames. The crook of events has led to nationalist debates astir gubernatorial offices weaponising hold and the consequent interaction connected federalism.
Prolonged impasse
The contiguous lawsuit dealt with the prolonged impasse betwixt the State and the Governor implicit the assignment of Vice-Chancellors to the APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University and the Digital Sciences University.
The Supreme Court intervened connected August 18 to name Justice (retired) Sudhanshu Dhulia to caput a search-cum-selection committee to urge names for assignment arsenic Vice-Chancellors of the 2 varsities. The tribunal had ordered the shortlisted names, endorsed by Justice Dhulia, to beryllium placed earlier the Chief Minister for his consideration. The August 18 bid had entitled the Chief Minister to urge to the Governor the shortlisted names successful bid of penchant for assignment arsenic Vice-Chancellors.
In September, the Governor’s bureau had returned to the apical court, seeking a modification of the August 18 bid regarding the relation of the Chief Minister successful the assignment process. The Governor had argued that neither the University Grants Commission nor the State laws governing the 2 universities envisaged a relation for the Chief Minister successful the assignment process. The exertion had contended that the Chief Minister’s engagement would beryllium tantamount to a idiosyncratic judging his ain cause.
In an urgent oral notation earlier Justice Pardiwala’s Bench connected Friday, the Kerala government, represented by elder advocator Jaideep Gupta and advocator C.K. Sasi, said Justice Dhulia had handed implicit the study to the Chief Minister, who had, successful turn, forwarded it to the Governor.
“Has the Chancellor looked into the study of Justice Dhulia?” Justice Pardiwala asked the counsel appearing for the Chancellor.
The lawyer responded that though the study was received, the full grounds was not handed over.
“This is not conscionable an mean portion of paper. A erstwhile justice of the Supreme Court has looked into it. So you are to look into the study and instrumentality an due call,” Justice Pardiwala orally addressed the Governor’s side.
The Bench reminded the counsel that the committee headed by Justice Dhulia was appointed by the tribunal with the concurrence of each the parties successful the case.
“It is expected of the Chancellor to present look into the study filed by the committee headed by Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and proceed further successful the substance accordingly… We neglect to recognize wherefore the non-receipt of the grounds is coming successful the mode of looking into the study filed by the committee. In specified circumstances, we present expect the Chancellor to instrumentality an due determination successful accordance with the study of the Committee,” the tribunal observed successful the order.
The Bench scheduled the lawsuit for proceeding adjacent week.
