3 months ago
2
The India-AI Impact Summit 2026 is connected successful New Delhi and I americium reminded of a story. A erstwhile colleague, Nirmita, who is visually impaired, erstwhile recovered herself successful an absurd ineligible position. She could not legally acquisition a publication from the United States successful a disability-friendly format called DAISY (Digital Accessible Information System), adjacent though I, arsenic a sighted reader, was capable to acquisition immoderate people oregon e-books I wished. This was due to the fact that of the vagaries of copyright law.
To code this issue, our non-governmental organisation, unneurotic with planetary coalitions of disablement rights organisations, engaged successful years of advocacy astatine the planetary level. These efforts yet led to the instauration of the Marrakesh Treaty, which enables the cross-border speech of accessible-format books arsenic good arsenic nationalist exceptions for visually impaired persons to usage exertion to person books into accessible formats erstwhile publishers bash not marque them available. The copyright manufacture — from publication publishers to the movie manufacture — powerfully opposed the treaty, which sought to found a ‘right to read’ for visually impaired persons arsenic immoderate objection to copyright instrumentality was viewed arsenic fundamentally unacceptable, adjacent if it was astatine the disbursal of denying entree to the visually impaired.
It is present copyright maximalism
The conflict of visually impaired persons against overly rigid copyright laws highlights a cardinal problem: copyright has expanded acold beyond its archetypal purpose, and copyright maximalism present actively obstructs the instauration of and entree to knowledge. This statement has taken connected a renewed vigour acknowledgment to Artificial Intelligence (AI) models, galore of which crook retired to beryllium utile lone erstwhile they person ample quantities of grooming information (which, for connection models, inevitably means copyrighted works). But earlier looking astatine AI, copyright needs to beryllium understood successful a humanities perspective.
We person had creation for acold longer than we person had copyright. The Statute of Anne, wide seen arsenic the archetypal copyright law, was passed successful Britain successful 1710, aft the epoch of Shakespeare and Milton. The British brought copyright instrumentality to India successful 1847. The existent Copyright Act is from 1957. In 1710, the instrumentality granted authors a constricted monopoly of 14 years, with the anticipation of 1 renewal. The monopoly close would lone vest if it was specifically registered and aggregate copies of the publication deposited for organisation among libraries and universities.
Under the existent law, the monopoly close goes good beyond the enactment of publishing, vests automatically the infinitesimal ‘a work’ is created, and lasts for the author’s full beingness positive 70 years posthumously. So, the thousands of random Instagram posts and notebook doodles that you person made are each protected nether copyright instrumentality for centuries. While the nationalist domain was erstwhile the default, present a nearly-perpetual copyright monopoly is the default, careless of the commercialized imaginable of the enactment oregon ambitions of the creator. This cardinal alteration successful the quality of the instrumentality has deleterious consequences.
Findings from a study
As portion of a probe task by LIRNEasia, a Sri Lankan deliberation tank, we studied the information governance regimes of 7 countries successful South and Southeast Asia. With respect to copyright, we recovered that successful 4 retired of seven, the instrumentality made web hunt engines and AI grooming illegal. Web hunt engines request to transcript arsenic overmuch of the Web arsenic they tin (a process called ‘crawling’), efficaciously creating a reflector transcript of each that is reachable connected the web done links, but permissionless copying is prohibited by copyright law. Except successful the Philippines and Sri Lanka (which person a flexible ‘fair use’ exception) and India (which, successful 2012, introduced a circumstantial objection for ‘the transient oregon incidental storage’ for ‘providing physics links, entree oregon integration’), nary different state successful our survey provided an exception, meaning AI grooming is efficaciously amerciable successful astir countries we surveyed.
This does not marque sense. Web hunt engines and AI models bash not presumption copyrighted materials arsenic scribblings oregon poems oregon creation the mode humans do; for programs, it is simply ‘data’ for statistical purposes. Recognising this, galore jurisdictions specified arsenic the European Union, Japan and Singapore person adopted ‘text and information mining’ exceptions successful their copyright regimes, portion others specified arsenic Hong Kong and South Korea are successful the process of doing so. Japan’s instrumentality allows for an exemption for “Exploitations not for enjoying the ideas oregon emotions expressed successful a work” (i.e., usage by machines), and permits “using the enactment successful information analysis”. This is sensible: copyright was ne'er meant to screen mechanistic uses.
By not allowing for a wide substance and data-mining exception, India has created a pall of ineligible uncertainty implicit the postulation of the grooming information for galore forms of AI. And by not having a flexible, wide and open-ended objection (as countries specified arsenic Singapore and the United States do), India ensures that copyright instrumentality volition ever hamper technological developments.
There are abstracted concerns astir the outputs of generative AI substituting originative labour. But copyright is meant to beryllium astir encouraging creativity, not astir protecting jobs. Further, copyright instrumentality has ne'er prohibited learning from examples and imitating — each creator studies predecessors, and each writer reads widely. Technology has ever displaced jobs — we person acold less rickshaw pullers, telegraphists, pankhaawallahs, stenographers, assistance operators, slope tellers, typesetters, darkroom technicians and draughtsmen — yet, it has created caller jobs arsenic well. The advent of photography reduced the request for portraitists, but enabled caller forms of creativity and entree to knowledge. We bash not cognize what the interaction of generative AI volition be: we might, successful the future, request greater authorities grants for arts and culture, oregon to fortify the cooperative movement, perchance funded by taxes from ample AI companies. But these ought not beryllium dealt with successful copyright law.
Creativity, entree should beryllium promoted
What copyright instrumentality should protect, however, are contributions to the commons. Open-licensed AI models and datasets exemplify this — developers and researchers absorbing monolithic computational costs to make what enables others to beryllium creative. These models adhd to the communal practice of mankind alternatively than subtracting from it. Copyright instrumentality should promote specified contributions, not hinder them with the aforesaid restrictions designed to forestall commercialized exploitation. Governments are besides uniquely positioned to curate high-quality locally-relevant datasets for nationalist benefit, they should found harmless harbour provisions that support specified datasets from copyright claims, astatine slightest erstwhile utilized for grooming open-source models.
We person seen copyright instrumentality repeatedly being weaponised to artifact beneficial technologies nether the guise of protecting creators. The Authors Guild successful the U.S. utilized copyright to artifact Amazon Kindle’s “Read Aloud” function, contempt it being assistive exertion that enabled visually impaired persons to perceive to books they had legally purchased. Current copyright instrumentality blocks technologies that could democratise entree to knowledge, unleash creativity, and thrust innovation — the precise things that copyright was meant to foster. India’s hosting of the AI Summit is the infinitesimal to act: it indispensable pb efforts for each nations to follow flexible exceptions that service creators and the public, alternatively than the copyright industry. We request to bring copyright instrumentality into the 21st period by returning to its roots.
Pranesh Prakash is simply a tech instrumentality and argumentation consultant, moving with deliberation tanks, tech companies and universities. This nonfiction is based connected probe funded by LIRNEasia, based connected a assistance from IDRC, a Canadian taxpayer-funded probe donor. The views expressed are personal
