The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court connected Monday quashed the bid cancelling the licence of Cethar Hospital, Tiruchi, to behaviour liver and kidney transplantations. The tribunal held that the statutory process was not followed.
The tribunal was proceeding the petition filed by Cethar Hospital. The licence was temporarily suspended successful July and was permanently cancelled successful August successful the aftermath of the amerciable kidney merchantability racket being reported successful Tamil Nadu. The petitioner infirmary challenged the bid passed by the State. As akin bid had been passed against Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital astatine Perambalur.
Justice G. R. Swaminathan observed that Section 16 (2) of the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, intelligibly states that lone aft giving tenable accidental of being heard to the hospital, the due authorization tin cancel the registration.
The tribunal observed that the process has been fixed a implicit spell by. The authorization did not adhere to the principles of earthy justness arsenic enshrined successful the provision. A specified look astatine the bid of cancellation is capable to reason that the statutory process has been wholly disregarded. It is simply a lawsuit of fertile illegality.
The tribunal observed that erstwhile instrumentality prescribes adopting a peculiar and specified procedure, it indispensable beryllium followed. The lawsuit whitethorn pertain to transplantation. But the authorization cannot transplant oregon supplant their ain procedure. No announcement was issued. No proceeding was given.
The materials said to person been gathered by the authorization were not furnished to the petitioner. The restitution of the authorization that determination was breach of statutory provisions by the registrant indispensable travel idiosyncratic hearing, the tribunal observed.
On this sole crushed of usurpation of principles of earthy justness and the information that the process contemplated nether Section 16 of the Act was not complied with, the bid of cancellation is acceptable aside, the tribunal observed.
The impugned bid of cancellation stands quashed. The bid of suspension volition not revive arsenic it has merged with the cancellation order. It is needless to notation that due authorization is astatine liberty to enactment arsenic per law, the tribunal observed.

7 months ago
2


