5 months ago
1
The Tamil Nadu authorities has alleged that a survey, purportedly conducted by scientists of the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT)-Kanpur astatine the behest of the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) was “illegal”, contending that the institute lacked jurisdiction and had nary locus standi to run successful the State.
According to authoritative sources, the State authorities wrote to IIT-Kanpur seeking details of the survey, including the scientists progressive and the ground connected which the appraisal of soil mining on riverbeds successful Tamil Nadu was carried out. The ED had engaged IIT-Kanpur arsenic portion of its probe into alleged large-scale irregularities successful soil mining and resultant nonaccomplishment to the State exchequer. The institute was tasked with assessing the quantum of soil mined astatine 28 permitted sites during October-November 2023.
Based connected the survey report, the ED alleged that amerciable mining beyond permissible limits had taken spot and estimated the worth of excess soil mining implicit the past respective years astatine ₹4,730 crore, arsenic against the recorded gross of ₹36.45 crore earned by the State government.
Seeking to refute the allegations, the Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Water Resources Department, wrote to the Director of IIT-Kanpur seeking clarifications, including whether Professor Rajiv Sinha, who led the survey, was authorised to undertake it, sources said.
In his reply, the IIT-Kanpur Director stated that Prof. Sinha, who authored and certified the report, had not been granted permission by the institute for the play during which the survey was reportedly conducted — from October 7 to November 5, 2023. The connection said nether the Conduct Rules of IIT-Kanpur, an worker was not permitted to permission the presumption without anterior support of the department, adjacent portion connected leave.
‘Report legally invalid’
In a presumption study filed earlier the Madras High Court, the State authorities cited these communications and asserted that it was evident that “the said Professor ne'er ever visited the State of Tamil Nadu for the alleged survey and that helium had lone prepared the study connected paper,” rendering the survey study “legally invalid”.
The State further alleged that the survey was really conducted by Terraqua Private Limited, a institution founded by Prof. Sinha and incubated astatine IIT-Kanpur.
Pointing retired that the IIT-Madras was disposable wrong Tamil Nadu, the State authorities questioned wherefore the ED had chosen a backstage institution incubated nether IIT-Kanpur instead. The authorities besides contended that IIT-Kanpur had nary jurisdiction to run successful Tamil Nadu, citing Section 6(1)(1A) of the Indian Institutes of Technology Act, 1961. The proviso states that each IIT shall assistance States and Union Territories wrong its designated portion successful enhancing prime and capacity, and whitethorn counsel connected method and technological matters referred to it wrong that zone.
“In presumption of this statutory provision, an IIT-Kanpur incubated entity should not person ventured extracurricular its portion nether the guise of conducting a survey, that excessively without immoderate intimation to the State authorities concerned,” sources said, quoting the report.
The State authorities maintained that the ED and the IIT-Kanpur incubated institution had exceeded their jurisdiction and authority, and that the survey study truthful lacked immoderate ineligible basis.
Alleged usurpation of drone rules
The study besides alleged violations of the Drone Rules, 2021, stating that drones were flown without adhering to the prescribed Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). As per the SOP issued nether the Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, 2017, and guidelines of the Ministry of Civil Aviation, anterior support is mandatory earlier operating an unmanned craft system.
In the contiguous case, nary anterior support was obtained from the Directorate General of Civil Aviation, the Collector, oregon the Superintendent of Police of the jurisdiction acrophobic for conducting the drone survey, the sources said.
