7 months ago
2
A Hyderabad-based paediatrician’s long-standing combat against sugar-rich beverages falsely marketed arsenic oral rehydration solutions (ORS) has resulted successful a large regulatory change. The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has issued an bid stating that nary nutrient marque whitethorn usage the word ‘Oral Rehydration Salts’ oregon ‘ORS’ connected its products unless the formulation adheres strictly to the standards recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO).
The directive, issued connected October 14, mandates the contiguous withdrawal of each erstwhile permissions granted to Food Business Operators (FBOs) for utilizing ‘ORS’ successful conjunction with their marque names. Specifically, it rescinds 2 earlier orders, dated July 14, 2022, and February 2, 2024, that had allowed the usage of ‘ORS’ arsenic portion of a trademark with a prefix oregon suffix, provided the statement included a disclaimer stating, “The merchandise is Not an ORS look arsenic recommended by WHO.”
Clarification issued connected misleading labelling
On October 15, time aft the directive connected October 14, FSSAI issued a elaborate clarification reaffirming that the usage of ‘ORS’ successful immoderate nutrient product’s name, whether fruit-based, non-carbonated, oregon ready-to-drink, violates the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, and related regulations. The regulator stated that specified labelling ‘misleads consumers by mode of false, deceptive, ambiguous, and erroneous names oregon statement declarations,’ and truthful contravenes aggregate provisions nether the Act.
A paediatrician’s combat for user safety
This regulatory involution stems from a persistent ineligible run by Dr. Sivaranjani Santosh, who began questioning deceptive selling practices astir a decennary ago. In 2022, she filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) earlier the Telangana High Court, challenging the merchantability of beverages falsely advertised arsenic ORS contempt not gathering WHO-recommended electrolyte and glucose standards.
Her petition highlighted however respective companies marketed ‘fruit juices’ and different sweetened beverages nether the guise of being oral rehydration solutions, posing imaginable risks, peculiarly to children and diabetic patients. Dr. Sivaranjani’s complaints besides reached Rajesh Bhushan, the past Secretary of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, prompting judicial and regulatory scrutiny.
Court involution and archetypal FSSAI response
The Telangana High Court, led by the Chief Justice, sought responses from some the FSSAI and the Drug Controller General of India, recognising the imaginable nationalist wellness implications of misleading ORS claims. Following this, connected April 8, 2022, FSSAI issued its archetypal directive restricting the usage of ‘ORS’ successful nutrient labels oregon advertisements. However, connected July 14 that aforesaid year, the FSSAI informed Dr. Sivaranjani that the regularisation was temporarily relaxed pursuing a writ petition filed by respective companies. The regulator decided to let manufacturers holding valid trademarks to proceed producing specified products nether their registered names until the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks issued a last decision.
WHO-approved ORS vs. sugar-loaded imitations
The World Health Organisation prescribes a modular oral rehydration solution with a full osmolarity of 245 mOsm/L. This creation includes 2.6 grams of sodium chloride, 1.5 grams of potassium chloride, 2.9 grams of sodium citrate, and 13.5 grams of dextrose anhydrous (sugar) per litre of water.
In contrast, respective products marketed arsenic ORS by pharmaceutical companies incorporate importantly higher sweetener levels, astir 120 grams of full sweetener per litre, with astir 110 grams being added sugar. Their electrolyte equilibrium is besides inconsistent with WHO norms, providing conscionable 1.17 grams of sodium, 0.79 grams of potassium, and 1.47 grams of chloride per litre.
Reflecting connected the outcome, Dr. Sivaranjani described the FSSAI bid arsenic the culmination of years of persistence and nationalist support. “It was a war. Eight years of battle, 3 years of filing PILs, and 4 to 5 years of warring indifference. This triumph belongs not to 1 person, but to people’s power, each the doctors, advocates, moms, and influencers who stood with me. I stood steadfast, and we won,” she said.
