2 months ago
2
The communicative truthful far: The rift successful the AIADMK widened connected Wednesday (May 13, 2026) nighttime successful the aftermath of the enactment wide caput Edappadi K. Palaniswami removing 26 rebel territory secretaries including 12 legislators from their positions. Among those who were sacked from their posts were erstwhile Ministers C.Ve. Shanmugam and S.P. Velumani. Earlier successful the day, the part successful the organisation was retired successful the Assembly erstwhile 22 legislators, owing allegiance to Mr. Palaniswami, opposing the spot motion, moved by the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) authorities and 25 MLAs favouring the motion.
Also Read | Anti-defection instrumentality applies adjacent if a faction splits from a party: Supreme Court
What is the ineligible presumption connected defections?
As per the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution and the Members of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly (Disqualification Ground of Defection) Rules, 1986, determination are 2 grounds for disqualification successful the lawsuit of defection — erstwhile a subordinate voluntarily gives up rank of his oregon her governmental enactment and erstwhile a subordinate votes oregon abstains from voting contrary to immoderate absorption issued by his oregon her governmental party. It remains to beryllium seen whether Mr. Palaniswami is going to mention the 2nd scenario, which appears to beryllium a straightforward lawsuit of defection. In September 2017, the past Assembly Speaker P. Dhanapal referred to the archetypal scenario, portion disqualifying 18 AIADMK MLAs for having fixed representations successful the erstwhile period to Governor Ch. Vidyasagar Rao, expressing their deficiency of assurance successful Mr. Palaniswami, who was the Chief Minister.
Comment | The anti-defection instrumentality is facing convulsions
How person courts of instrumentality viewed the subject?
Over the years, antithetic judicial pronouncements person been fixed and successful immoderate cases, judgements person differed from each other. The campy led by Mr. Palaniswami cites the Supreme Court’s judgement successful the Shiv Sena lawsuit of May 2023 wherein the Court addressed 1 of the issues which is of relevance to Tamil Nadu. In Maharashtra too, conflicting whips were issued by rival groups to members of the Shiv Sena. Eventually, the Court held that “to clasp that it is the legislature enactment which appoints the Whip would beryllium to sever the figurative umbilical cord which connects a subordinate of the House to the governmental party.” It concluded that “the governmental party, and not the legislature party, appoints the Whip and the Leader successful the House.”
Comment | The hollowing retired of the anti-defection law
What are the positions of the rival groups?
Mr. Palaniswami is of the presumption that he, being the wide caput of the party, had appointed his colleague-former Minister “Agri” S.S. Krishnamurthy arsenic the whip of the legislature enactment and the latter, successful turn, conveyed done e-mail, registered station and SMS, astir the enactment to beryllium pursued by the legislators successful the Assembly connected the spot motion. He claims the AIADMK’s legislature enactment has been constituted with himself astatine the helm. He besides contends written consent has been secured from each the legislators with respect to his predetermination arsenic the person of the legislature party.
However, Mr. Shanmugam dismisses Mr. Palaniswami’s relationship of events and asserts that nary predetermination has taken place. He besides demands that the solution with respect to the assignment of the person and the whip beryllium made public. On the contrary, his radical has nominated persons for antithetic posts successful the legislature party. Mr. Shanmugam and Mr. Velumani emphasise their volition is not to origin immoderate divided successful the enactment and admit that Mr. Palaniswami remains the wide caput of the party.
What is the people of enactment expected from Assembly Speaker J.C.D. Prabhakar and the 2 groups of the AIADMK?
If Mr. Palaniswami gives a petition to the Speaker requesting him to initiate disqualification proceedings, Mr. Prabhakar tin acceptable the process successful question by sending notices to the legislators concerned. Ordinarily, 7 days volition beryllium provided to specified members for giving their comments. Upon the receipt of the members’ responses, the Speaker tin either determine connected his ain oregon notation the substance to a committee and await the panel’s report, aft which helium tin instrumentality a last call.
Else, the Speaker tin reason that the AIADMK’s legislature enactment has not yet been constituted and whitethorn not instrumentality cognisance of the petition, if any, fixed by the Palaniswami camp.
