HC upholds trial court judgment acquitting suspected ‘Maoists’

6 months ago 2
ARTICLE AD BOX

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court connected Monday upheld the judgement of a proceedings tribunal acquitting 7 suspected ‘Maoists’ arrested connected the complaint of engaging successful arms grooming successful Kodaikanal forests successful 2008.

The tribunal was proceeding an entreaty preferred by the State against the judgement of the Dindigul Principal District and Sessions Court, which successful 2021 acquitted Kannan, Kalidoss, Bhagat Singh, Reena Jois Mary, Shenbagavalli, Ranjith and Neelamegam.

The prosecution lawsuit was that connected receiving accusation that ‘Maoists’ were undergoing arms grooming successful Kodaikanal hills, the Special Task Force conducted a hunt operation, during which 1 Naveen Prasad was killed successful an encounter. Seven others who had escaped were secured later.

The State submitted that the proceedings tribunal failed to see the grounds of the Forensic Science Laboratory which would beryllium that the constabulary enactment was not an encounter, but an enactment of self-defence. The counsel for the 7 persons submitted that nary hunt was conducted by the constabulary successful Kodaikanal hills. Since the constabulary encountered a person, successful bid to conceal it, they registered a mendacious case.

A Division Bench of Justices P. Velmurugan and R. Poornima pointed retired that eyewitnesses admitted the incidental took spot successful a dense wood and were incapable to place the accused astatine the clip of the occurrence. No photographs were taken by the constabulary to place the spot of occurrence and the assemblage of the deceased.

It was admitted by constabulary officials that wood officials were connected work passim the area. As per a witnesser evidence, wood officials accompanied the constabulary duting the operation. However, nary of the wood officials was made a witnesser successful the case. Recovery of weapons from the spot of occurrence was not decently proved by the prosecution. Further, determination was nary grounds to amusement that blood-stained world which was reportedly recovered was sent to laboratories, the tribunal said.

The tribunal said specified pendency of erstwhile transgression cases against the accused did not found their engagement successful the contiguous case. The prosecution wholly failed to found that the accused unsocial participated successful the alleged incident. The prosecution had not produced an mishap register, blood-stained articles oregon different materials sent for forensic introspection to substantiate that the accused sustained gunshot injuries astatine the spot of occurrence. The aesculapian grounds besides did not enactment the prosecution, the tribunal said.

Moreover, determination was an unexplained hold successful registering and forwarding the FIR, which created superior doubts. Some of the explosives were allegedly kept successful a backstage godown, and were not sent for chemic analysis, the tribunal observed.

Published - November 11, 2025 12:53 americium IST

Read Entire Article