8 months ago
2
The Telangana High Court connected Wednesday passed an interim absorption mounting speech the azygous justice bid relating to Group-I services main exam conducted by the Telangana State Public Service Commission.
This order, though an interim one, would wide the way for the TGPSC to implicit the last signifier of filling up 563 posts of Group-I cadre for which it issued notification successful February of 2024. A seat of Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice G.M. Mohiuddin, which pronounced the order, made it wide that immoderate assignment orders to beryllium issued by the TGPSC would beryllium taxable to the result of the entreaty petitions.
These appeals were filed by the TGPSC and immoderate of the ‘successful candidates’, who made it to the Final Marks List and General Ranking List, challenging the azygous justice verdict. The singe judge, done his verdict, had acceptable speech the FML and the GRL portion instructing the TGPSC to re-evaluate the main exam reply scripts. If re-evaluation was not possible, the full main exam should beryllium conducted again wrong 8 months, the azygous justice absorption said.
The seat directed the AG and the counsels of the ‘successful candidates’ and the advocates for the respondents to record their written submissions by October 10. A elaborate proceeding would beryllium held again connected October 15.
Advocate General A. Sudarshan Reddy, appearing for TGPSC, contended that determination was nary infirmity successful conducting the exam and each effort was made to guarantee each details astir the exam were successful nationalist domain. Not a azygous ineligible oregon procedural regularisation was violated by the Commission successful conducting the exam. The AG said the exam for Group-I services was conducted for the archetypal clip since the enactment of abstracted Telangana State successful 2014.
The CJ sought to cognize what was the ground for the azygous justice to get astatine the decision that ‘TGPSC had not maintained transparency, integrity and acted successful biased mode and deviated their ain rules’. “Integrity is simply a delicate expression”, the CJ said noting that specified inference cannot beryllium drawn unless immoderate mala fide volition was proved oregon idiosyncratic was favoured.
The CJ besides pointed retired the remark successful the azygous justice bid which said that the candidates who wrote the main exam studied for 10 to 12 hours a day. How did the writ tribunal which passed the bid cognize astir this, helium sought to know. The seat led by the CJ raised respective different queries pertaining to the exam. “Did the worldly disposable connected grounds successful the writ petitions constituent retired to a large-scale wide irregularity?,” the CJ asked.
The seat asked the counsels of some the appellants and respondents details astir the normalisation, scaling and moderation adopted during valuation of the reply scripts. It besides raised the constituent if the azygous justice bid was based connected issues relating to non-compliance of definite procedures similar enactment of evaluators, introspection centres and segregation of centres for antheral and pistillate candidates.
The counsels for the respondents argued that the ‘whole introspection process suffered from procedural irregularities’. The valuation of the reply sheets was besides undertaken without immoderate backing of rules, they said.
