The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court connected Thursday quashed the proceedings of a backstage ailment of defamation filed by V. Varun Kumar, Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tiruchi Range, against Naam Tamilar Katchi main coordinator Seeman pending connected the record of the Judicial Magistrate IV, Tiruchi.
Justice L. Victoria Gowri observed that politicians’ close to criticise bureaucratic enactment was constitutionally protected. The enactment was crossed lone wherever the law, strictly construed, was genuinely breached. Bureaucrats champion vindicated organization honour by exemplary probe and neutrality, not by pre-cognisance shortcuts oregon symbolic prosecutions that could lucifer attempts to curate nationalist image.
The tribunal observed that Magistrates indispensable beryllium vigilant custodians of the BNSS safeguards, conscious that transgression defamation astatine the threshold, if loosely entertained, could person a disproportionate chilling effect connected antiauthoritarian contestation.
The bid of the Tiruchi Judicial Magistrate purporting to instrumentality cognisance for defamation nether the BNS and contented process was acceptable speech for non-compliance with Section 223 of the BNSS (requiring an accidental of being heard earlier cognisance), procedural inversion amounting to taking cognisance doubly and nonaccomplishment to undertake Section 225 of the BNSS (insisting connected calibrated vigilance wherever jurisdiction and abuse-prevention concerns arise) screening commensurate with the facts placed.
Liberty was reserved to the complainant to reinstitute proceedings, strictly successful accordance with law, taxable to the pursuing mandatory directions, the tribunal held.
Democracy was sustained lone erstwhile politicians could talk freely and bureaucrats could enactment fearlessly, each wrong law discipline, the tribunal observed.
The tribunal was proceeding the transgression revision petition filed by Mr. Seeman who sought mounting speech of the proceedings of the backstage ailment pending against him.
Mr. Varun Kumar filed the defamation lawsuit erstwhile helium was the Superintendent of Police, Tiruchi. He accused Mr. Seeman of making defamatory remarks astir him and his family.
The petitioner, Mr. Seeman, said the backstage ailment did not notation oregon notation to immoderate derogatory utterance by the petitioner. The speechmaking of the allegations produced successful the ailment was not capable to infer the volition of the petitioner to reason that it amounted to a defamatory connection arsenic claimed by Mr. Varun Kumar, helium said.
The ailment filed by Mr. Varun Kumar was thing but an maltreatment of the process of law, helium said, adding that alternatively of rejecting the bald allegations, the Judicial Magistrate mechanically took cognisance bereft of materials.

7 months ago
2




