The Telangana High Court dismissed a batch of transgression petitions filed by atom millers from assorted districts seeking directions to quash the cases registered against them connected charges of diverting paddy meant for Public Distribution System for idiosyncratic gains.
Justice J. Sreenivasa Rao, portion pronouncing the verdict connected the pleas questioning issuance of FIRs against them, noted that the atom millers failed to present customized milled rice, equivalent to the paddy authorities had supplied. The allegations included that the petitioners “dishonestly and fraudulently misappropriated and diverted the paddy for their idiosyncratic and pecuniary gains”.
The allegations “prima facie disclose cognisable offences and necessitate investigation”, the bid said. When the “investigation is astatine the threshold”, the petitioners were not entitled for quashing the proceedings, the justice said, and did not hold with the contention of the petitioners that Section 316 (5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita cannot beryllium invoked against them since they did not autumn wrong the meaning of ‘agent’ arsenic per Section 182 of the Contract Act 1872.
They maintained that they entered into an statement with the Civil Supplies Corporation to proviso customized milled atom arsenic per the paddy supplied by the latter. Describing the statement that Section 316 (5) of BNS cannot beryllium invoked against them arsenic ‘misconceived’ notion, the justice noted that execution of the statement and the admitted entrustment of paddy intelligibly established a narration of bureau coupled with dominion implicit property.
The judgement said that the atom millers (having entered into a contractual statement for customized milling, having received the paddy procured nether the MSP scheme) were nether binding work to person and instrumentality the customized milled atom to the corporation. “Such entrustment squarely attracts Section 316 (5) of the BNS,” the verdict said.
“Mere characterisation of the transaction (returning customized milled rice) arsenic ‘job work’ does not detract from the ineligible effect of entrustment, arsenic it is the beingness of power coupled with an oblivion to instrumentality oregon relationship that is determinative,” the justice noted.

3 weeks ago
1







