HC directs Home Department to pay compensation to man against whom case was foisted

5 months ago 1
ARTICLE AD BOX

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has directed the Home Department to wage ₹8 lakh arsenic compensation to a antheral from Thanjavur territory for intelligence suffering, societal stigma and nonaccomplishment of occupation opportunity. The tribunal held that the constabulary had foisted a transgression lawsuit against him.

The tribunal was proceeding the petition filed by Sarathkumar who sought quashing of the proceedings pending against him. Madukkur Police successful Thanjavur territory had registered the lawsuit against him and others for the offence nether Section 399 (making mentation to perpetrate dacoity) of IPC successful 2017. The FIR was kept pending. Therefore, the petitioner filed the petition to quash the proceedings.

Justice B. Pugalendhi observed that successful bid to marque retired an offence nether Section 399 of IPC determination indispensable beryllium 5 oregon much persons, they indispensable person made mentation and the mentation was for the intent of committing dacoity. Mere assembly of a radical of persons is not capable to pull the offence nether Section 399 of IPC. There indispensable beryllium immoderate materials to amusement that assembly was for the intent of mentation to perpetrate dacoity.

In the case, determination was nary worldly to found the mentation made by the accused. For the incidental said to person taken spot successful 2017, the constabulary person not filed their last study for the past 8 years. Moreover the FIR was sent to the tribunal lone successful 2025. It is wide that the FIR successful this lawsuit has been sent lone aft a play of 8 years successful usurpation of Section 157 of CrPC and PSO 552, the tribunal said.

All these amusement that the transgression lawsuit has been foisted against the petitioner. Therefore, the tribunal is obligated to quash the FIR that is pending against the petitioner, the tribunal said.

The tribunal observed that it was a wide lawsuit wherever the rights of the petitioner nether Article 21 of the Constitution was violated. The close to beingness does not notation to specified carnal enactment of breathing oregon living. It consists of a overmuch wider scope of rights including the close to unrecorded with dignity and reputation.

The tribunal was inclined to grant compensation to alleviate the suffering of the petitioner. At the aforesaid time, this would besides service arsenic a deterrent to the authorities to guarantee that the cardinal rights of the citizens are hereafter not violated successful specified a manner, the tribunal observed.

Published - November 26, 2025 08:41 p.m. IST

Read Entire Article