Goa nightclub fire case: Delhi court dismisses Luthra brothers' transit anticipatory bail pleas

7 months ago 1
ARTICLE AD BOX
Gaurav Luthra (centre) and Saurabh Luthra (right) who fled India aft  a occurrence  astatine  his Goa nightclub that claimed 25 lives. The Thailand Police detained the Luthra brothers connected  December 11, 2025.

Gaurav Luthra (centre) and Saurabh Luthra (right) who fled India aft a occurrence astatine his Goa nightclub that claimed 25 lives. The Thailand Police detained the Luthra brothers connected December 11, 2025. | Photo Credit: PTI

A Delhi tribunal connected Thursday (December 11, 2025) rejected the transit anticipatory bail pleas of Saurabh and Gaurav Luthra, owners of Birch by Romeo Lane nightclub successful Goa wherever a monolithic occurrence past week killed 25 people.

On Wednesday (December 10), the accused sought 4 weeks of transit anticipatory bail truthful that they were not instantly arrested aft their instrumentality to Delhi from Thailand.

Additional Sessions Judge Vandana dismissed the bail plea. A elaborate bid is awaited.

During the proceedings, counsel for the State of Goa opposed the pleas, saying, “They left, they concealed, and they are present seeking leniency.”

He said the Luthra brothers had near Goa instantly aft the occurrence incidental and had been “evading the ineligible process”.

The State counsel said the instrumentality does not assistance those who garbage to taxable to summons oregon warrants.

Referring to judicial observations, helium said: “Once it is shown that a idiosyncratic is attempting to evade the process of law, the tribunal should not travel to his assistance astatine all.”

He added that anticipatory bail is simply a discretionary alleviation and cannot beryllium granted to those who person “created obstacles successful the execution of warrants oregon concealed themselves”.

The counsel submitted that superior allegations were pending, including non-bailable warrants. “This is not a lawsuit for granting the privilege of anticipatory bail. The gravity of the offence and the behaviour of the applicants disentitle them from immoderate protection,” helium argued.

Seeking the relief, 1 of the counsels for the applicants argued that they were consenting to instrumentality instantly and look the investigation, and urged the tribunal not to “punish them astatine the threshold”.

He said the brothers had approached the Delhi tribunal astatine the earliest accidental and undertook to articulation the probe without delay. “If I onshore successful India contiguous and the investigating serviceman (IO) tells maine to look astatine midnight, I volition beryllium there,” helium said.

The counsel said that transit bail was not a determination connected merits but a constricted extortion to guarantee harmless entree to the close court.

He cited a Supreme Court bid permitting an accused abroad, against whom Blue and Red Corner notices were contemplated, to instrumentality to India with impermanent protection.

“I lone question extortion for a fewer days to scope the tribunal safely. When a national is consenting to taxable to the law, the Court indispensable widen a helping hand, not a fist,” helium said.

Published - December 11, 2025 07:03 p.m. IST

Read Entire Article