A erstwhile Indian Police Service (IPS) serviceman from Gujarat has moved the Supreme Court challenging a Gujarat High Court bid wherever the second declined to widen the retired officer’s exemption from surrendering successful a 41-year aged case. The tribunal is yet to database the substance for hearing.
The refusal to widen the exemption by the Gujarat High Court connected October 9 prompted a sessions tribunal successful Bhuj to contented a warrant for his apprehension connected October 10.
Kuldip Sharma, a 1976-batch IPS serviceman of Gujarat cadre, retired successful 2014. He has successful the past criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi and arsenic the caput of the State CID probed respective cases, including the Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake brushwood case.
The sessions tribunal successful Bhuj connected September 24 confirmed a three-month imprisonment nether Section 342 IPC (wrongful confinement), primitively pronounced by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhuj, connected February 10 against Mr. Sharma and erstwhile sub-inspector G.H. Vasavada.
Mr. Sharma successful his petition earlier the apex tribunal has said the condemnation stems from a backstage ailment filed connected May 8, 1984, alleging elemental wounded (Section 323 IPC), wrongful confinement (Section 342 IPC), and transgression intimidation (Section 506 IPC) against Mr. Sharma — past Superintendent of Police, Kutch and SI Girish Vasavada. The proceedings tribunal acquitted some officers of each charges but Section 342 IPC.
The serviceman has contended that the alleged incidental took spot connected May 6, 1984 and progressive a idiosyncratic identified arsenic Ibhala Seth, who had respective transgression cases registered against him. The idiosyncratic is dead.
Initially, Gujarat State defended the accused officers, with its ineligible representatives appearing successful enactment astatine some proceedings and appellate levels. No prosecution authorisation was granted for 28 years, and the ailment remained stayed. The determination was reversed successful February 2012, with the State authorities granting authorisation to prosecute the officers.
A root adjacent to Mr. Sharma said, “the complainant, Ibhala Seth, is deceased. He was listed arsenic a smuggler by Customs and flagged arsenic a information fishy by the police. The alleged offence is minor, the grounds tenuous, and the hold extraordinary. Yet, post-2012, the State reversed its position. On October 9, the State — done its nationalist authoritative and Additional Advocate General —opposed the revision applications and interim alleviation sought by Mr. Sharma and Mr. Vasavada.”

7 months ago
2


