ED attaches properties worth ₹16.95 crore in co-operative society scam

3 months ago 1
ARTICLE AD BOX

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Bengaluru Zonal Office, has provisionally attached 11 immovable properties worthy ₹16.95 crore belonging to Srivaibhava Sourhardha Pattina Sahakari Niyamitha president Nagavalli B.S., CEO Rajesh V.R., and their associated entities nether the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002.

According to a merchandise issued connected Saturday, the attachment bid was passed connected February 12. The properties, comprising land, plots, and buildings located successful Ramanagara, Mysuru, and Bengaluru, were allegedly acquired utilizing proceeds of transgression generated done transgression activities.

The ED initiated an probe based connected an FIR registered by Subramanyapura Police Station, Bengaluru, against Srivaibhava Sourhardha Pattina Sahakari Niyamitha, Nagavalli, Rajesh, and others. The FIR was filed pursuing a ailment by the Managing Director of Karnataka State Federal Co-Operative Ltd.

As per the complaint, the nine had sanctioned loans to entities owned by its president and CEO without obtaining due security. The indebtedness amounts were allegedly not repaid, resulting successful wrongful nonaccomplishment to depositors.

During the probe nether the PMLA, the ED gathered further FIRs and complaint sheets filed by the constabulary against the accused nine and its cardinal absorption personnel. The probe revealed that Rajesh and Nagavalli had incorporated the co-operative nine successful 2011 with dishonest intent to mobilise nationalist deposits and divert them for idiosyncratic gain.

Investigators allege that successful collusion with different accused persons and entities — galore of which were allegedly created by them — the mates diverted astir ₹65 crore of nationalist deposits, thereby generating proceeds of crime. A important information of the funds was allegedly routed done their idiosyncratic slope accounts and fictitious entities for the intent of wealth laundering.

The diverted funds were allegedly utilized for purchasing immovable properties, concern investments and idiosyncratic consumption.

Published - February 14, 2026 06:42 p.m. IST

Read Entire Article