Expressing interest implicit the prolonged pendency of a bail plea, the Delhi High Court has granted bail to an accused who has been successful custody since October 2021, observing that keeping bail applications pending for inordinately agelong periods amounts to trauma and violates cardinal rights.
In an bid passed connected February 12, Justice Girish Kathpalia observed, “it is simply a substance of superior interest that bail applications remained pending for specified inordinately agelong play earlier the Court of Sessions arsenic good arsenic this court”.
The tribunal noted that the exertion successful the contiguous lawsuit was archetypal listed connected December 20, 2024, earlier a predecessor seat and was thereafter adjourned earlier antithetic benches. It came up earlier the contiguous justice for the archetypal clip lone now.
The justice recorded the “genuine” anguish expressed by counsel for the accused Aman that the bail plea had remained pending for 25 months earlier the proceedings court, contempt an aboriginal proceeding request, and continued to stay undecided adjacent earlier the High Court.
Mr. Aman is 1 of the accused successful a lawsuit of fatally stabbing 1 idiosyncratic and injuring different during a abrupt quarrel successful 2021.
Counsel for the accused submitted that helium has been successful custody since October 24, 2021, and argued that the incidental occurred successful the spur of the moment.
The Additional Public Prosecutor, opposed the bail plea. However, the prosecution conceded that each nationalist witnesses had already been examined, and truthful determination was nary likelihood of the accused tampering with grounds if released.
“It has been repeatedly observed successful plethora of judicial pronouncements that whether it beryllium allowed oregon beryllium dismissed, a bail exertion should not stay pending for specified agelong periods. For, that successful itself is simply a trauma for the incarcerated accused and usurpation of his cardinal rights,” the tribunal observed.
“Considering the supra circumstances, I bash not find immoderate crushed to further deprive liberty to the accused/applicant. Therefore, the bail exertion is allowed and accused/applicant is directed to beryllium released connected bail subject...,” the tribunal ordered.

3 months ago
3




