7 months ago
3
A Delhi tribunal past week dismissed a plea filed by advocator Mehmood Pracha seeking to state the Ram Janmabhoomi Ayodhya judgement delivered by the Supreme Court successful 2019, arsenic null and void. The tribunal besides slapped a good of ₹6 lakh connected Mr. Pracha for filing a “false and frivolous” appeal.
District justice Dharmender Rana of the Patiala House Courts successful an bid issued connected October 18 said that of late, a precise antagonistic inclination is discernible successful the nine which is to people important nationalist functionaries aft they demit offices.
“Some unscrupulous litigants nurtures a misconceived conception that upon demitting bureau an ex-public functionary becomes susceptible and prone to each benignant of malicious and malefic assault,” the tribunal said.
It added that the concern becomes distressful erstwhile the protector himself turns predator. In the lawsuit astatine hand, the appellant, contempt being a reasonably elder counsel, has opted to take the incorrect colour of jersey.
“Instead of participating successful the solution, helium has opted to augment the problem. The appellant herein has not lone filed a mendacious and frivolous suit but has adjacent filed an perfectly luxurious and frivolous appeal,” the tribunal observed.
Mr. Pracha’s plea earlier the District Court was to situation a civilian tribunal bid of April this year, which had rejected his suit by imposing a outgo of ₹1 lakh for maltreatment of process.
Noting that it is evident that the outgo imposed by the proceedings tribunal has failed to execute the intended extremity of deterrent effect, the territory tribunal said, “Therefore, I americium of the considered sentiment that successful bid to efficaciously cheque the menace of frivolous and luxurious litigation, the outgo magnitude needs to beryllium suitably enhanced to fetch the desired results.”
In his main suit, Mr. Pracha had stated that erstwhile Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud (one of the 5 judges connected the Supreme Court Bench that decided the Ayodhya Ram Janmabhoomi case), successful a code past twelvemonth had admitted that the Ayodhya verdict was successful presumption of the solution provided to him by ‘Bhagwan Shri Ram Lala Virajman’, who was besides a plaintiff successful the case.
Mr. Pracha, thus, demanded the tribunal to state the 2019 Ayodhya judgement arsenic null and void.
“Evidently, the Hon’ble Judge was praying to the Supreme Being to assistance him find retired a mode whereas the litigant earlier the Hon’ble Judge successful the Ayodhya lawsuit was a juristic property chiseled from the Supreme Being. The appellant seems to person missed the subtle favoritism betwixt the ‘Supreme God’ and the ‘Juristic Personality’ litigating earlier the Court, astir apt connected relationship of misunderstanding the instrumentality and religion. It appears that the appellant has not cared to spell done the Ayodhya lawsuit judgment, different specified a disorder would not person arisen successful his mind,” the tribunal stated connected Mr. Pracha’s appeal.
It added that seeking guidance from the almighty cannot beryllium berated arsenic a fraudulent enactment to summation an unfair advantage, either successful instrumentality oregon successful immoderate religion.
