1 month ago
2
There person been recurrent media reports of arrests of Muslims from divers societal and nonrecreational backgrounds — they see gym owners, aesculapian practitioners, and spiritual clerics — connected allegations of participating successful organised networks that facilitate spiritual conversion from Hinduism to Islam. These reports person predominantly emerged from North India, peculiarly Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand. Most of the cases stay nether investigation. If substantiated, specified developments could bespeak a caller signifier of ideological churn wrong segments of Muslim nine successful India. Otherwise, they hazard being perceived arsenic manufactured narratives driven by an ideologically motivated state.
The past wide acknowledged lawsuit of wide conversion to Islam successful India occurred successful February 1981 successful Meenakshipuram, Tamil Nadu, wherever 558 Dalits embraced Islam to flight entrenched caste oppression. Reflecting connected the episode, Atal Bihari Vajpayee observed that Hindu nine suffered from long-standing ills, peculiarly distinctions based connected commencement and caste. The conversions were frankincense rooted successful inequalities interior to Hindu society.
Also Read | What we cognize truthful acold astir the Supreme Court’s ruling connected preservation for converted Dalits
Contentious issue
Religious conversion — peculiarly from Hinduism to Islam and Christianity — has agelong been a contentious issue. Mahatma Gandhi, successful particular, according to Laura D. Jenkins, writer of Religious Freedom and Mass Conversion successful India, viewed wide conversions not lone arsenic a menace to the mediocre and the uneducated but besides to anti-colonial unity.
The astir symbolically almighty conversion successful modern Indian past was that of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, who embraced Buddhism successful 1956. On October 13, 1935, Ambedkar had declared his volition to permission Hinduism astatine the Depressed Classes Conference successful Yeola. He said, “I was calved a Hindu, but I volition not dice a Hindu.” For Ambedkar, conversion was an enactment of emancipation. In the intervening period, helium repeatedly urged Dalits to permission Hinduism for immoderate religion of their choice, including Islam.
He adjacent took the inaugural for Dalits to person to Sikhism, which recovered unexpected enactment from Dr. B.S. Moonje, a salient person of the Hindu Mahasabha, who encouraged Hindu leaders to endorse the conversion. However, this met absorption from Mahatma, C. Rajagopalachari and Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya. One of Gandhi’s main arguments against Ambedkar leaving Hinduism was the content that Dalit followers would wantonness him erstwhile helium ceased to beryllium a Hindu. Had Gandhi been live today, helium would person realised however profoundly mistaken this appraisal was. The enduring reverence for Ambedkar among Dalits, despite, and so due to the fact that of, his conversion, stands arsenic a almighty rebuttal to that prognosis.
EXPLAINED | What is the Maharashtra Freedom of Religion Bill?
Over the decades
Concerns surrounding spiritual conversion and legislative attempts to modulate conversion began adjacent nether the assemblage administration. For instance, the Raigarh State Conversion Act (1936) and the Patna Freedom of Religion Act (1942) sought to show conversions. The question of spiritual state and conversion was debated successful the Constituent Assembly, culminating successful the formulation of Article 25(1) of the Constitution, which guarantees state of conscience and the close freely to profess, practise, and propagate religion. But law designation of spiritual state did not nutrient lasting governmental oregon societal consensus.
In autarkic India, a bid of anti-conversion laws person been enacted and periodically amended by assorted secular governments good earlier Hindu nationalists emerged arsenic a ascendant electoral force, chiefly successful effect to concerns implicit Christian missionary activities. The Orissa Freedom of Religion Act (1967) and the Madhya Pradesh Dharma Swatantrya Adhiniyam (1968) are salient examples. However, Hindutva close organisations argued that these laws are inadequate to efficaciously curb spiritual conversion.
Also Read | Supreme Court issues notices to 12 States connected plea implicit anti-conversion laws
Specific instances
Consequently, respective States ruled by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) person amended existing legislation. The scope of these laws has expanded beyond concerns astir Christian missionary enactment to see conversions to Islam, peculiarly successful the discourse of allegations framed arsenic “love jihad”. The Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Act (UFRA), 2018, for instance, illustrates this trajectory. The instrumentality was further tightened successful 2022, with enhanced penalties, including longer situation terms. In 2025, the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion (Amendment) Bill, 2025 projected expanding punishment from 3 to 10 years, extending up to 20 years oregon adjacent beingness imprisonment successful utmost cases. However, these person not yet been notified, arsenic the Bill was returned by the Governor for reconsideration. The implementation of these laws has generated important ineligible disputes.
Under the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion (Amendment) Act, 2022, reports bespeak that 20 cases were filed successful 2023 and 18 much by September 2025. Of the cases brought to afloat proceedings nether the 2018 Act, respective person resulted successful acquittal. Such authorities has not been confined to BJP-ruled States. The Himachal Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act (2006), for example, was enacted nether a Congress government, and the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Forcible Conversion of Religion Act 2002, introduced by the J. Jayalalithaa-led AIADMK authorities and aboriginal modified successful 2006 by the M. Karunanidhi-led DMK government. This underscores the broader governmental statement crossed ideological lines connected regulating spiritual conversion.
These acts, successful practice, person often encouraged vigilantism, starring to instances of unit and disruptions to India’s secular societal fabric. Therefore, it is imperative that governments reappraisal these acts.
