Communication of grounds of arrest in writing in accused’s language is a must: Supreme Court

6 months ago 2
ARTICLE AD BOX
In lawsuit  of non-compliance, the apprehension  and consequent  remand would beryllium  rendered amerciable  and the idiosyncratic   would beryllium  acceptable   free, the Supreme Court directed. File

In lawsuit of non-compliance, the apprehension and consequent remand would beryllium rendered amerciable and the idiosyncratic would beryllium acceptable free, the Supreme Court directed. File | Photo Credit: PTI

The Supreme Court, successful a important verdict connected Thursday, held that arrested persons indispensable beryllium furnished with the grounds of apprehension successful penning successful a connection they understand, irrespective of the quality of the offence oregon statute involved.

The Bench of Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai and A.G. Masih held that the grounds of apprehension indispensable beryllium “supplied successful penning wrong a tenable time, and successful immoderate lawsuit 2 hours anterior to the accumulation of the arrestee earlier the Magistrate for remand proceedings”.

“Mere connection of the grounds successful a connection not understood by the idiosyncratic arrested does not fulfil the Constitutional mandate nether Article 22 of the Constitution of India. The nonaccomplishment to proviso specified grounds successful a connection understood by the arrestee renders the Constitutional safeguards illusory and infringes the idiosyncratic liberty of the idiosyncratic arsenic guaranteed nether Article 21 and 22 of the Constitution,” the apex tribunal observed.

Also Read | Informing accused grounds of apprehension law requirement: Supreme Court

In lawsuit of non-compliance, the apprehension and consequent remand would beryllium rendered amerciable and the idiosyncratic would beryllium acceptable free, the tribunal directed. The judgement was based connected a lawsuit arising from the high-profile Mumbai hit-and-run incidental of July 2024 involving a BMW vehicle.

Justice Masih, who authored the verdict for the Bench, underscored that the Constitutional mandate nether Article 22(1) of the Constitution, which guarantees that an arrested idiosyncratic indispensable beryllium informed “as soon arsenic whitethorn be” of the grounds of arrest, was not a procedural formality but a cardinal safeguard of idiosyncratic liberty.

“This tribunal is of the sentiment that to execute the intended nonsubjective of the Constitutional mandate of Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India, the grounds of apprehension indispensable beryllium informed to the arrested idiosyncratic successful each and each lawsuit without objection and the mode of the connection of specified grounds indispensable beryllium successful penning successful the connection helium understands,” Justice Masih wrote.

“The grounds of apprehension indispensable beryllium communicated successful penning to the arrestee successful the connection he/she understands and successful case(s) where, the arresting officer/person is incapable to pass the grounds of apprehension successful penning connected oregon soon aft arrest, it beryllium truthful done orally. The said grounds beryllium communicated successful penning wrong a tenable clip and successful immoderate lawsuit astatine slightest 2 hours anterior to accumulation of the arrestee for remand proceedings earlier the Magistrate,” the judgement directed.

Published - November 06, 2025 10:27 p.m. IST

Read Entire Article