Centre rejects RTI seeking details of pre-legislative consultations on VB-G RAM G Act

3 months ago 1
ARTICLE AD BOX
Congress workers signifier    a protestation  arsenic  portion  of party's nationwide ‘MGNREGA Bachao Sangram’, a wide    outreach run  against the Union government's determination   to regenerate  the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) with the Viksit Bharat-Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission Act, oregon  VB-G RAM G, successful  Noida, connected  January 11, 2026.

Congress workers signifier a protestation arsenic portion of party's nationwide ‘MGNREGA Bachao Sangram’, a wide outreach run against the Union government's determination to regenerate the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) with the Viksit Bharat-Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission Act, oregon VB-G RAM G, successful Noida, connected January 11, 2026. | Photo Credit: PTI

The Union Rural Development Ministry has rejected a Right to Information (RTI) exertion that sought details of consultations the Centre held with State governments earlier introducing the caller agrarian employment instrumentality — the Viksit Bharat-Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB‑GRAM G) Act, 2025.

The RTI exertion referred to an nonfiction by Union Rural Development Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, published successful The Hindu connected December 24, successful which helium stated that the Bill was “preceded by extended consultations with State governments, method workshops and multi-stakeholder discussions”.

He had besides said that the halfway plan features of the authorities were shaped by lessons from years of implementation arsenic good arsenic feedback from States.

Chakradhar Buddha of the United Forum for RTI Campaign sought records of these pre-legislative consultations with States, on with details of method workshops and multi-stakeholder discussions cited by Mr. Chouhan. He besides sought interior notes showing however inputs from these consultations were incorporated into the drafting of the VB‑GRAM G Act, 2025.

In its response, the Ministry said the accusation could not beryllium shared due to the fact that the strategy “has not yet been formally notified by the States/UTs and has not go operational successful immoderate State/UT”. It added that the implementation process was inactive nether mode and the substance had “not attained finality oregon completion”.

Disclosing the accusation astatine this stage, it said, would impact sharing records of “ongoing deliberations and decision-making relating to argumentation implementation”.

Published - February 25, 2026 10:52 p.m. IST

Read Entire Article