Aravalli row: Won't pass order in favour of mining lease holders for now, says Supreme Court

2 weeks ago 1
ARTICLE AD BOX
The Supreme Court said determination   were circumstantial  ecological issues and successful  February it had asked the situation  ministry and different   stakeholders to suggest   names of domain experts for a sheet  to specify  the Aravalli hills and ranges. File

The Supreme Court said determination were circumstantial ecological issues and successful February it had asked the situation ministry and different stakeholders to suggest names of domain experts for a sheet to specify the Aravalli hills and ranges. File | Photo Credit: PTI

The Supreme Court connected Friday (May 15, 2026) said it won't walk immoderate bid successful favour of mining lease holders for present arsenic it has been getting "quite disturbing" feedback regarding mining successful the Aravalli hills and range.

The apex tribunal said determination were circumstantial ecological issues and successful February it had asked the situation ministry and different stakeholders to suggest names of domain experts for a sheet to specify the Aravalli hills and ranges.

"We volition not perceive this substance successful a piecemeal (manner). We volition not licence immoderate enactment unless we are afloat satisfied," a Bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi said aft the matter, listed for proceeding connected Friday (May 15, 2026), was mentioned.

The apical tribunal is proceeding a suo motu lawsuit titled "In Re: Definition of Aravalli hills and ranges and ancillary issue".

"Lot of things are happening there. We are getting feedback and it is rather disturbing," the CJI observed.

The Bench told the lawyer who mentioned the substance if immoderate mining lease is cancelled, the acrophobic enactment whitethorn situation it. "We volition not walk immoderate bid successful favour of the mining lease holders now. This is simply a delicate matter," the Bench said.

On November 20, 2025, the apical tribunal accepted a azygous explanation of the Aravalli hills and ranges and banned the assistance of caller mining leases wrong its areas spanning Delhi, Haryana, Rajasthan and Gujarat until experts' reports are out.

It accepted the recommendations of a ministry committee connected the explanation of the Aravalli hills and ranges to support the world's oldest upland system.

The committee recommended that "Aravalli Hill" beryllium defined arsenic immoderate landform successful designated Aravalli districts with an elevation of 100 metres oregon much supra its section relief, and an "Aravalli Range" volition beryllium a postulation of 2 oregon much specified hills wrong 500 metres of each other.

On December 29, the apical tribunal took enactment of the outcry implicit the caller explanation of the Aravallis and kept successful abeyance its November 20 directions accepting a azygous explanation of the hills and ranges. It had besides stalled each mining activities.

It remarked that determination was request to resoluteness "critical ambiguities", including whether the criteria of 100-metre elevation and the 500-metre spread betwixt hills would portion a important information of the scope of biology protection.

How the Aravalli Hills formed and wherefore they look the mode they do

Earlier, the apical tribunal said it prima facie seemed that the earlier study of a committee and the verdict had "omitted to expressly clarify definite captious issues" and determination is "dire request to further probe" to forestall immoderate regulatory gaps that mightiness undermine the ecological integrity of the Aravalli region.

It besides directed that, arsenic acceptable retired successful a May 9, 2024 order, nary support shall beryllium granted for mining successful the 'Aravalli Hills and Ranges', arsenic defined successful the August 25, 2010, FSI report, without its anterior permission.

"There has been a important outcry among environmentalists, who person expressed profound interest astir the imaginable for misinterpretation and improper implementation of the recently adopted explanation and this court's directions," the seat had said.

Published - May 15, 2026 12:54 p.m. IST

Read Entire Article