All 12 accused in Turkman Gate violence case get bail

3 months ago 2
ARTICLE AD BOX
The tribunal  said in-depth valuation  of grounds  was not required and continued detention of accused was unnecessary

The tribunal said in-depth valuation of grounds was not required and continued detention of accused was unnecessary | Photo Credit: FILE PHOTO

Acity tribunal connected Tuesday granted bail to each 12 accused successful the Turkman Gate unit case, observing that the disposable camera footage did not intelligibly place them arsenic participants successful the mob that pelted stones astatine constabulary and municipality personnel.

Additional Sessions Judge Bhupinder Singh of the Tis Hazari Courts granted bail to Mohammad Kashif, Mohammad Kaif, Mohammad Ubaidullah, Mohammad Imran, Mohammad Adnan, Sameer Hussain, Mohammad Naved, Mohammad Athar, Mohammad Areeb, Amir Hamza, Mohammad Aadil, and Adnan connected a enslaved of ₹50,000 each.

The tribunal said that an in-depth valuation of grounds was not required astatine this signifier and continued detention of the accused looked unnecessary. The lawsuit relates to clashes that broke retired during an anti-encroachment thrust adjacent Faiz-e-Ilahi mosque successful the Ramlila Maidan country connected the intervening nighttime of January 6 and 7. The unit erupted aft rumours connected societal media that a mosque other Turkman Gate was being demolished.

According to the police, a mob of astir 150-200 radical hurled stones and bottles astatine them and Municipal Corporation of Delhi personnel, injuring six policemen, including a Station House Officer.

‘No circumstantial footage’

Opposing the bail pleas, the prosecution said the incidental had been captured done drone surveillance. However, the tribunal noted that nary circumstantial footage was presented during the proceeding to found the wide recognition of immoderate of the applicants arsenic progressive participants successful stone-pelting oregon immoderate different circumstantial overt act. The justice besides suggested that deploying high-quality body-worn cameras and CCTV cameras during delicate operations specified arsenic demolition drives would assistance close recognition and heighten transparency.

Addressing the complaint of effort to execution nether Section 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the tribunal acknowledged the seriousness of the offence but observed that the aesculapian files presently connected grounds did not picture immoderate of the injuries sustained by constabulary unit arsenic grievous successful nature.

‘Bail cannot beryllium refused’

“Seriousness unsocial cannot beryllium the lone crushed to contradict bail... Bail cannot beryllium refused due to the fact that the offence alleged carries a terrible punishment. Pre-trial detention is not meant to service arsenic punishment,” the tribunal said.

Balancing the gravity of allegations with the cardinal close to idiosyncratic liberty, the tribunal said nary intent would beryllium served by keeping the accused down bars during the pendency of the trial.

“Where the alleged victims are constabulary unit and the investigating bureau is drawn from the aforesaid establishment, the work to guarantee transparency, objectivity and demonstrable fairness becomes adjacent much imperative,” it said.

Published - February 18, 2026 01:21 americium IST

Read Entire Article