Alberta province plans public vote on whether to hold referendum on leaving Canada

15 hours ago 1
ARTICLE AD BOX
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith. File

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith. File | Photo Credit: Reuters

Canada's oil-rich state of Alberta volition clasp a referendum successful October connected leaving Canada, but the province's premier said it won't really beryllium a ballot connected whether to separate.

Danielle Smith said voters alternatively would beryllium deciding whether it's clip to clasp a referendum connected quitting Canada.

“I privation to beryllium clear. I enactment Alberta remaining successful Canada, and this is however I would ballot connected separation successful a provincial referendum. It is besides the presumption of my government,” Ms. Smith said successful televised remarks connected Thursday (May 21, 2026).

The question volition inquire whether Alberta should enactment successful Canada oregon instrumentality ineligible steps nether the Constitution to clasp a binding referendum connected leaving.

Ian Brodie, a erstwhile main of unit to erstwhile Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper and a present a governmental subject prof astatine the University of Calgary, said Ms. Smith appears to beryllium proceeding precise carefully.

“A ballot to spot if radical adjacent privation a vote. It's a bully mode to fto the plaything voters plaything against separation,” Mr. Brodie said.

A “yes” ballot successful a binding referendum inactive would not trigger independence. Negotiations with the national authorities would person to instrumentality place. A 1998 Supreme Court ruling means provinces cannot secede unilaterally from Canada.

Daniel Beland, a governmental subject prof astatine McGill University successful Montreal, noted Ms. Smith has publically opposed independency truthful immoderate radical person compared her stance to the 1 of Britain's then-Prime Minister David Cameron up of the Brexit referendum, which helium embraced arsenic a mode to negociate a vocal faction of his ruling enactment portion not wanting the UK to permission the European Union.

“Politically Ms. Smith seems committed to bash truthful to appease supporters of her ain enactment who privation a referendum. If she doesn't travel suit, she mightiness look a perchance perilous mutiny wrong her partisan ranks,” Mr. Beland said.

Earlier connected Thursday (May 21, 2026), 3 members of Ms. Smith's United Conservative Party of Alberta caucus passed a question successful committee asking her and her furniture to enactment the contented to a referendum connected October 19.

Prime Minister Mark Carney's national Liberal authorities has been moving with Ms. Smith to get an lipid pipeline to the Pacific seashore built to marque galore Albertans happy.

“Canada's authorities powerfully believes that the interests of Albertans and each Canadians are champion served erstwhile we enactment together,” Dominic LeBlanc, the Federal Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, posted connected societal media.

Mr. Beland said Ms. Smith's question is framed successful specified a mode that immoderate voters could ballot successful favour of an independency referendum to nonstop a connection to the national authorities and the remainder of Canada without really taking the hazard of voting straight for independence.

“It mightiness little the evident stakes, making it possibly easier for immoderate voters to deliberation they tin nonstop a governmental connection to the remainder of the state without taking the hazard of starring the state to the constituent of nary return,” helium said.

Mr. Beland said a imaginable aboriginal referendum is apt to suffer arsenic enactment for separation is somewhat little than 30% but said campaigns bash matter.

Opposition Federal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre earlier said helium and each Conservative members of Parliament would property for Alberta to stay portion of Canada successful a referendum campaign.

Ms. Smith said a Judge made an mistake past week erstwhile she ruled a national led petition designed to unit a referendum was unconstitutional. “In her address, Ms. Smith explained that a caller tribunal ruling makes specified a binding notation intolerable for now, which justifies the caller question,” Mr. Beland said.

Published - May 22, 2026 12:13 p.m. IST

Read Entire Article