Affidavit on AAIB inquiry into AI 171 crash to detail stages of probe, 'where it stands today': Government tells SC, seeks two more days

2 months ago 1
ARTICLE AD BOX
The London-bound Air India flight, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner (AI 171) with 242 radical   connected  board, crashed into a aesculapian  hostel and its canteen analyzable  adjacent   the Ahmedabad airport, sidesplitting  12 unit  members and 229 passengers connected  June 12, 2025.

The London-bound Air India flight, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner (AI 171) with 242 radical connected board, crashed into a aesculapian hostel and its canteen analyzable adjacent the Ahmedabad airport, sidesplitting 12 unit members and 229 passengers connected June 12, 2025. | Photo Credit: PTI

The Union Government connected Tuesday (March 24, 2026) said it needed a mates of days much to record an affidavit enumerating the stages of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) probe into the Air India Flight 171 clang and the existent status.

Appearing earlier a Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said the affidavit would person the details of the assorted phases of the probe and “where it stands today”.

The clang adjacent the Ahmedabad airdrome killed 12 unit members and 229 passengers connected June 12, past year.

The petitioners, including 91-year-old Pushkar Raj Sabharwal, the begetter of Commander Sumeet Sabharwal, 1 of the pilots connected the ill-fated aircraft, person urged the tribunal to bid a judicially-monitored autarkic probe.

The different petitioners see the Federation of Indian Pilots and an NGO, Safety Matters Foundation.

The petitioners had antecedently argued that they did not mean to “apportion blame” but to unearth “what” caused the mishap and to safeguard the aboriginal against specified tragedies.

The tribunal had besides made it wide that the intent of an AAIB enquiry nether Section 4C of the Aircraft Act 1934 and the Aircraft (Investigation of Accidents and Incidents) Rules, 2017 was not to delegate blame.

Mr. Sabharwal had approached the court, shocked by the “nasty” reportage astir his lad and rumours of aviator error. He had argued that the AAIB probe was flawed.

His petition was triggered by a preliminary report, published successful the media, containing what was believed to beryllium a little verbal speech betwixt the 2 pilots, caught connected the flight’s achromatic box. In this, 1 of them reportedly inquired astir the substance power being chopped off, portion the different replied helium had not switched it off. The crushed for the clang was said to beryllium the abrupt stoppage of the substance proviso to some the engines.

Mr. Mehta had earlier submitted that the probe was successful compliance with planetary conventions and mandatory steps required by the International Civil Aviation Organisation to beryllium taken successful cases of aerial accidents.

He had maintained that determination was a statutory authorities nether Section 4C successful place, adding that the authorities cannot crook its backmost connected the law. 

Published - March 24, 2026 04:20 p.m. IST

Read Entire Article